Table 3.
Logistic regression predicting factors associated with being in an exclusive relationship versus non-exclusive relationship at last vaginal intercourse
| Variables | No sexual experience |
Casual partner |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% | C.I. | OR | 95% | C.I. | |
| Age | .55*** | .45 | 0.67 | .91 | 0.72 | 1.14 |
| Gender (male) | 1.60* | .96 | 2.65 | 3.04*** | 1.68 | 5.49 |
| Ethnicity (White) | .73 | .41 | 1.31 | .76 | .40 | 1.44 |
| Parental income | 1.09 | .95 | 1.25 | 1.02 | .87 | 1.19 |
| Sexual intercourse, T1 | .01*** | .00 | .02 | .78 | .44 | 1.38 |
| Overall TV exposure, T1 | 1.03*** | 1.01 | 1.06 | .99 | .97 | 1.02 |
| Music video TV exposure, T1 | .92** | .85 | .99 | 1.01 | .93 | 1.09 |
| Premium cable TV exposure, T1 | 1.04 | .95 | 1.14 | 1.09** | 1.00 | 1.19 |
| Adult cable TV exposure, T1 | .34*** | .20 | .59 | 1.07 | .78 | 1.47 |
| Sexually suggestive broadcast TV exposure, T1 | .89 | .49 | 1.60 | 1.19 | .62 | 2.30 |
Note: Exclusive relationship is the reference group
*
p < .10;
**
p < .05;
***
p < .01