Table 2. Longitudinal Regression Models of Parenting Style and Frequency of Family Meals in Younger Project EAT (1998-1999) Cohort†.
Frequency of Family Meals Longitudinal Analyses (Model 2)+ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Degrees of Freedom | P Value | Parenting Style & Mean Frequency of Family Meals per Week | ||||
Authoritative | Authoritarian | Permissive | Neglectful | |||
DAUGHTERS (n = 438) | ||||||
Frequency of Family Meals & Mothers' Parenting Style: | 3 | .135 | 3.12 | 2.80 | 3.01 | 2.14 |
Frequency of Family Meals & Fathers' Parenting Style: | 3 | <.001 | 3.52a | 2.75a,b | 2.67a,b | 2.13b |
SONS (n = 362) | ||||||
Frequency of Family Meals & Mothers' Parenting Style: | 3 | .039 | 2.84a | 2.38a,b | 2.72a,b | 1.67b |
Frequency of Family Meals & Fathers' Parenting Style: | 3 | .441 | 2.70 | 2.38 | 2.48 | 2.07 |
Key:
All models adjusted for Age, Ethnicity/Race and SES
Longitudinal analyses only run in younger cohort because family meals question was not asked of older cohort at T2
Letter superscriptsa,b indicate results of post-hoc comparison of means. Means with different letters are significantly different at p < .01, For all means, higher values indicate higher frequency of family meals.