Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 20.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 Nov 8;32(5):1098–1108. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301228

Table 3.

Follow-Up Two-Way ANOVAs for Response Rates Within Each Nicotine Dose Condition

Infusion levera
VS leverb
Dose Phase Source df F Sig. df F Sig.
30 mg/kg/inf FR1 Session 11 4.24 0.00* 11 14.23 0.00*
Session* group 22 3.37 0.00* 22 3.26 0.00*
Error (session) 220 198
Group 2 12.06 0.00* 2 4.88 0.02*
Error 20 18
FR2 Session 9 6.21 0.00* 9 2.82 0.01*
Session* group 18 0.75 0.76 18 0.70 0.81
Error (session) 180 162
Group 2 11.21 0.01* 2 8.20 0.01*
Error 20 18
60 mg/kg/inf FR1 Session 11 8.24 0.00* 11 14.13 0.00*
Session* group 22 2.66 0.00* 22 2.13 0.01*
Error (session) 209 209
Group 2 5.70 0.01* 2 3.24 0.06
Error 19 19
FR2 Session 9 3.55 0.00* 9 5.30 0.00*
Session* group 18 1.06 0.40 18 1.98 0.01*
Error (session) 171 171
Group 2 15.12 0.00* 2 3.84 0.04*
Error 19 19
90 mg/kg/inf FR1 Session 11 8.34 0.00* 11 11.71 0.00*
Session* group 22 2.40 0.00* 22 3.51 0.00*
Error (session) 198 176
Group 2 22.01 0.00* 2 3.01 0.08
Error 18 16
FR2 Session 9 0.72 0.69 9 1.71 0.09
Session* Group 18 1.17 0.30 18 0.84 0.65
Error (session) 162 144
Group 2 13.22 0.00* 2 10.95 0.00*
Error 18

FR=fixed ratio schedule of reinforcement.

*

Indicates significant main effect or interaction according to a priori criterion, p≤0.05.

a

Contrasts 2-Lever, NIC+VS, and NIC-Only groups.

b

Contrasts 2-Lever, NIC+VS and VS-Only (0 μg/kg/infusion) groups.