Table 1.

Characteristics of 25 studies of interventions to promote repeat mammography screening^*

First author (reference)	Study population and setting				Measurement of repeat mammography				Intervention description
	Study years	Age range, y	% Non-Hispanic white	Study setting	% Up-to-date at baseline†	Screening interval, y	Design‡	Data source for screening outcome	Strategy	Delivery mode	No. of study groups	Control group	Theoretic framework
Andersen (61)	1994–1997	50–80	97	Community	∼50	2	1	SR	Education/motivation + counseling	Community education + telephone	4	Survey only	HBM, conflict model of decision making
Barr (65)	1994–1996	50–75	NR	Health care	100	2	1	AD and MR	Reminder	Telephone	3	Active	HBM, TRA
Bodiya (66)	NR	≥50	NR	Health care	100	1	1	AD	Reminder	Mail + phone	3	No contact	None
Clark (72)	1993–1996	50–74	95	Health care	54	1	1 and 2	MR	Education/motivation	Mail	3	Survey only	TTM
Costanza (75)	1994–1997	50–80	97	Health care	∼36	2	1 and 2	SR	Reminder + counseling	Mail + telephone	3	Active	HBM, TTM, conflict model of decision making
Crane (58)	1994–1996	≥50	79	Community	63	2	1	SR	Education/motivation + counseling	Mail + telephone	3	Survey only	TTM
DeFrank (70)	2004–2006	40–75	88	Health care	100	1	1	AD and SR	Reminder + education/motivation	Mail	3	Active	HBM
Drossaert (59)	NR	50–69	NR	Community	100	2	1	Program  records	Education/motivation	Mail	3	Active	Attitude-social influence-efficacy model
Duan (64)	1996–1998	50–80	53	Community	∼65	1	1	SR	Counseling	Telephone	2	Survey only	HBM
Eaker (60)	1993–1996	≥40	NR	Community	51	1: ≥50 y	1	SR	Reminder + education/motivation	Community education + mail	2	Survey only	None
						2: 40–49 y
Finney (23)	1999–2000	40–69	93	Health care	100	1	1	MR	Reminder	Mail	3	Active	Prospect theory
Goel (62)	2004	40–64	23	Community	100	1	1	Program  records	Reminder	Mail + telephone	2	Active	None
Lipkus (32)	1994–1997	≥50	82	Health care	72	1	2	SR	Reminder + counseling	Telephone	3	Active	HBM, TTM, conflict model of decision making
Margolis (73)	1992–1995	≥40	62	Health care	44	1: ≥50 y	1	AD and SR	Lay advisor/navigator	Mail + in person	2	Survey only	None
						2: 40–49 y
Mayer (67)	1995–1998	50–74	83	Health care	100	1	1	MR	Reminder	Mail	3	Survey only	TRA, operant learning theory
Messina (76)	1995–1998	50–80	97	Health care	32	2	2	SR	Education/motivation + counseling	Mail + telephone	2	Survey only	TTM
Michielutte (74)	1999–2002	≥65	86–93	Health care	31	1	1	MR	Education/motivation + counseling	Mail + telephone	2	Active	HBM, TTM
Partin (63)	1998–2000	40–63	89	Community	100	1	1	Program records	Reminder + education/motivation	Mail	3	Survey only	None
Quinley (71)	1999–2000	≥65	90	Health care	100	1	1	AD	Reminder	Mail	2	No contact	None
Rakowski (68)	1996–1998	50–74	88	Health care	100	1	1	AD	Reminder + education/motivation + counseling	Mail + telephone	4	Active	HBM, TTM, conflict model of decision making
Rimer (77)	1997–2000	40–44, 50–54	82	Health care	67	1	2	SR	Reminder + education/motivation + counseling	Mail + telephone	3	Active	ELM, TTM, PAPM
Schapira (69)	NR	40–70	NR	Health care	100	1	1	MR and SR	Reminder	Mail + in person	4	Active	None
Simon (31)	1992–1993	≥40	NR	Health care	4	1	1	MR	Reminder	Mail	3	Active	None
Skinner (78)	NR	≥51	48	Health care	49	1	2	MR	Education/motivation + counseling	Mail + telephone	4	Survey only	HBM, TTM
Vernon (29) and del Junco (28)	2000–2004	≥52	85	Community	46	1	2	SR	Education/motivation	Mail	3	Survey only	HBM, TTM, TRA/TPB, SCT

^*Of the 19 studies reporting racial/ethnic composition, most studied non-Hispanic white women. AD = administrative data; ELM = elaboration likelihood model; HBM = health belief model; MR = medical record; NR = not reported; PAPM = precaution adoption process model; SCT = Social Cognitive Theory; SR = self-report; TRA/TPB = theory of reasoned action/planned behavior; TTM = transtheoretical model.

^†In studies where 100% of the women had an up-to-date mammogram at baseline, the sample was selected to include only women who were not overdue for their next mammogram but would become due during the study period. In some instances, estimates had to be averaged across groups and so these are approximate estimates.

^‡Design 1 studies measured one pre- and one postintervention mammogram; design 2 studies measured two on-schedule postintervention mammograms.