Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 3;30(8):1460–1476. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.26

Table 1. Performance of spectral analysis algorithms in simulation dataa.

Whole brainb K1 (mL g−1 min−1) Vb λ rCPS (nmol g−1 min−1)
‘True' value 0.050 0.068 0.764 1.69
  Estimated value (mean±s.d.) Bias (%) RMSE (%) Estimated value (mean±s.d.) Bias (%) RMSE (%) Estimated value (mean±s.d.) Bias (%) RMSE (%) Estimated value (mean±s.d.) Bias (%) RMSE (%)
Unfiltered 0.081±0.047 61.4% 94.5% 0.065±0.005 −5.0% 7.3% 0.851±0.073 11.3% 9.6% 1.27±0.44 −24.5% 25.9%
Highpass EC filter 0.049±0.003 −2.4% 6.0% 0.072±0.006 5.2% 8.8% 0.746±0.037 −2.4% 4.8% 1.80±0.25 6.9% 14.6%
With restricted grid 0.051±0.001 1.8% 2.0% 0.068±0.001 −0.6% 1.5% 0.773±0.006 1.1% 0.8% 1.64±0.08 −3.0% 4.6%
SAIF 0.051±0.001 0.9% 1.9% 0.068±0.001 −0.5% 1.9% 0.762±0.006 −0.3% 0.8% 1.72±0.05 2.0% 2.7%
                         
Frontal cortexc K1 (mL g−1 min−1) Vb λ rCPS (nmol g−1 min−1)
‘True' value 0.051 0.071 0.757 1.79
  Estimated value (mean±s.d.) Bias (%) RMSE (%) Estimated value (mean±s.d.) Bias (%) RMSE (%) Estimated value (mean±s.d.) Bias (%) RMSE (%) Estimated value (mean±s.d.) Bias (%) RMSE (%)
Unfiltered 0.087±0.060 70.1% 118.1% 0.067±0.006 −6.1% 8.5% 0.869±0.083 14.8% 11.0% 1.14±0.59 −36.0% 33.2%
Highpass EC filter 0.050±0.002 −2.2% 3.9% 0.075±0.005 5.1% 7.0% 0.721±0.038 −4.8% 5.0% 2.11±0.31 18.0% 17.6%
With restricted grid 0.052±0.001 1.7% 2.0% 0.071±0.002 −0.5% 2.8% 0.750±0.008 −0.9% 1.1% 1.88±0.06 5.3% 3.2%
SAIF 0.052±0.001 1.4% 2.1% 0.071±0.001 −0.7% 1.4% 0.764±0.008 0.9% 1.0% 1.75±0.06 −2.3% 3.3%
                         
Corona radiatad K1 (mL g−1 min−1) Vb λ rCPS (nmol g−1 min−1)
‘True' value 0.031 0.032 0.792 0.89
  Estimated value (mean±s.d.) Bias (%) RMSE (%) Estimated value (mean±s.d.) Bias (%) RMSE (%) Estimated value (mean±s.d.) Bias (%) RMSE (%) Estimated value (mean±s.d.) Bias (%) RMSE (%)
Unfiltered 0.074±0.064 137.5% 210.1% 0.027±0.007 −16.8% 22.2% 0.887±0.075 11.9% 9.5% 0.66±0.27 −26.2% 30.3%
Highpass EC filter 0.029±0.003 −6.9% 9.9% 0.036±0.005 11.0% 15.8% 0.762±0.049 −3.8% 6.2% 0.99±0.18 11.2% 20.2%
With restricted grid 0.032±0.001 2.7% 3.3% 0.032±0.002 −1.4% 6.2% 0.799±0.012 0.8% 1.5% 0.87±0.06 −2.5% 6.2%
SAIF 0.032±0.001 1.5% 3.9% 0.032±0.002 −1.7% 5.7% 0.793±0.012 0.1% 1.5% 0.90±0.05 1.1% 5.4%
                         
Hippocampuse K1 (mL g−1 min−1) Vb λ rCPS (nmol g−1 min−1)
‘True' value 0.036 0.082 0.674 1.91
  Estimated value (mean±s.d.) Bias (%) RMSE (%) Estimated value (mean±s.d.) Bias (%) RMSE (%) Estimated value (mean±s.d.) Bias (%) RMSE (%) Estimated value (mean±s.d.) Bias (%) RMSE (%)
Unfiltered 0.165±0.197 356.2% 649.7% 0.067±0.021 −18.7% 31.6% 0.838±0.137 24.4% 31.8% 1.34±0.76 −29.8% 49.8%
Highpass EC filter 0.033±0.003 −8.4% 12.0% 0.089±0.007 8.1% 12.0% 0.578±0.086 −14.3% 19.1% 2.71±0.75 42.1% 57.6%
With restricted grid 0.037±0.002 1.6% 0.5% 0.081±0.005 −1.7% 0.2% 0.659±0.032 −2.2% 0.1% 2.07±0.21 8.5% 0.1%
SAIF 0.037±0.002 1.9% 6.7% 0.080±0.005 −1.9% 6.0% 0.668±0.032 −0.9% 4.8% 2.00±0.20 4.8% 11.7%

rCPS, regional rates of cerebral protein synthesis; RMSE, root mean square error; SAIF, spectral analysis with iterative filter.

a

Number of noise realizations=1000.

b

Simulation parameters: waK1a=0.042 mL g−1 min−1; wbK1b=0.0082 mL g−1 min−1; k2a+k3a=0.15 min−1; k2b+k3b=0.029 min−1; k4a=0.047 min−1; k4b=0.0089 min−1; Vb=0.068; noise level N=0.20 nCi min/mL.

c

Simulation parameters: waK1a=0.044 mL g−1 min−1; wbK1b=0.0075 mL g−1 min−1; k2a+k3a=0.13 min−1; k2b+k3b=0.018 min−1; k4a=0.042 min−1; k4b=0.0059 min−1; Vb=0.071; noise level N=0.25 nCi min/mL.

d

Simulation parameters: waK1a=0.021 mL g−1 min−1; wbK1b=0.0102 mL g−1 min−1; k2a+k3a=0.15 min−1; k2b+k3b=0.041 min−1; k4a=0.040 min−1; k4b=0.0107 min−1; Vb=0.032; noise level N=0.36 nCi min/mL.

e

Simulation parameters: waK1a=0.020 mL g−1 min−1; wbK1b=0.016 mL g−1 min−1; k2a+k3a=0.115 min−1; k2b+k3b=0.022 min−1; k4a=0.055 min−1; k4b=0.010 min−1; Vb=0.082; noise level N=0.70 nCi min/mL.