Table 2.
ERG Status | Patient Cohort | |||||
Pathologist evaluation | Positive | Negative | Combined | Sensitivity | 95.7% | |
Positive | 88 | 4 | Specificity | 96.5% | ||
Negative | 4 | 111 | PPV | 95.7% | ||
NPV | 96.5% | |||||
Fisher = 6.07e - 48 | ||||||
Pathologist evaluation | Positive | Negative | WCMC | Sensitivity | 100.0% | |
Positive | 60 | 2 | Specificity | 97.1% | ||
Negative | 0 | 66 | PPV | 96.8% | ||
NPV | 100.0% | |||||
Fisher = 1.01e - 34 | ||||||
Pathologist evaluation | Positive | Negative | UM | Sensitivity | 87.5% | |
Positive | 28 | 2 | Specificity | 95.7% | ||
Negative | 4 | 45 | PPV | 93.3% | ||
NPV | 91.8% | |||||
Fisher = 7.05e - 15 |
ERG FISH: negative versus positive (insertion + deletion); IHC: negative versus (weak + moderate + strong). Note that for the WCMC cohort, 128 cases were evaluated.