Skip to main content
. 2010 May 28;2010:1110.

Table 1.

GRADE evaluation of interventions for hip fracture

Important outcomes Mortality, function, and mobility (includes proportion of people returning to previous residential status; mobility status; measures of mobility and competence in activities of daily living), pain, quality of life, orthopaedic complications (see Outcomes section for outcomes included), medical complications (see Outcomes section for outcomes included), length of stay in hospital, adverse effects
Number of studies (participants) Outcome Comparison Type of evidence Quality Consistency Directness Effect size GRADE Comment
What are the effects of surgical interventions in people with hip fracture?
2 (129) Orthopaedic complications Conservative treatment v surgical treatment 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for sparse data
At least 16 (at least 2618) Mortality Internal fixation v arthroplasty (intracapsular hip fracture) 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for methodological issues of RCTs included in meta-analysis (concealing treatment allocation and no ITT analysis). Directness point deducted for wide range of implants assessed
At least 8 (at least 1113) Function and mobility Internal fixation v arthroplasty (intracapsular hip fracture) 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for methodological issues of RCTs included in meta-analysis (concealing treatment allocation and no ITT analysis). Directness point deducted for wide range of implants assessed
5 (at least 750) Pain Internal fixation v arthroplasty (intracapsular hip fracture) 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for methodological issues of RCTs included in meta-analysis (concealing treatment allocation and no ITT analysis). Directness point deducted for wide range of implants assessed
2 (520) Quality of life Internal fixation v arthroplasty (intracapsular hip fracture) 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for double analysis of some people included in the RCT
At least 19 (at least 3217) Orthopaedic complications Internal fixation v arthroplasty (intracapsular hip fracture) 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for methodological issues of RCTs included in meta-analysis (concealing treatment allocation and no ITT analysis). Directness point deducted for wide range of implants assessed
At least 8 (at least 1339) Medical complications Internal fixation v arthroplasty (intracapsular hip fracture) 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for methodological issues of RCTs included in meta-analysis (concealing treatment allocation and no ITT analysis). Directness point deducted for wide range of implants assessed
1 (198) Mortality Different types of internal fixation implants v each other (intracapsular hip fracture) 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results
1 (118) Function and mobility Different types of internal fixation implants v each other (intracapsular hip fracture) 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results
2 (317) Orthopaedic complications Different types of internal fixation implants v each other (intracapsular hip fracture) 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results. Directness point deducted for narrow range of techniques assessed
At least 4 (at least 393) Mortality Cemented v uncemented prostheses 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
At least 3 (at least 147) Function and mobility Cemented v uncemented prostheses 4 −2 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, methodological flaws in RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up) and statistical heterogeneity among RCTs included in meta-analysis. Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
2 (97) Pain Cemented v uncemented prostheses 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
At least 4 (at least 411) Orthopaedic complications Cemented v uncemented prostheses 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
2 (159) Medical complications Cemented v uncemented prostheses 4 −2 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, and for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
3 (433) Mortality Unipolar v bipolar hemiarthroplasty 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
1 (60) Function and mobility Unipolar v bipolar hemiarthroplasty 4 −2 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, and for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
At least 5 (at least 668) Orthopaedic complications Unipolar v bipolar hemiarthroplasty 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
1 (48) Medical complications Unipolar v bipolar hemiarthroplasty 4 −2 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, and for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
1 (180) Mortality Uncemented arthroplasty v total hip replacement 4 −2 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, and for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
2 (187) Function and mobility Uncemented arthroplasty v total hip replacement 4 −2 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, and for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
2 (232) Orthopaedic complications Uncemented arthroplasty v total hip replacement 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
2 (258) Mortality Cemented hemiarthroplasty v total hip replacement 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
2 (194) Function and mobility Cemented hemiarthroplasty v total hip replacement 4 −2 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, and for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
1 (121) Pain Cemented hemiarthroplasty v total hip replacement 4 −2 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, and for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
1 (131) Quality of life Cemented hemiarthroplasty v total hip replacement 4 −2 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, and for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
4 (415) Orthopaedic complications Cemented hemiarthroplasty v total hip replacement 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
At least 3 (at least 339) Medical complications Cemented hemiarthroplasty v total hip replacement 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (failure to conceal treatment allocation, no ITT analysis, incomplete reporting, and short follow-up). Directness point deducted for wide range of prostheses and surgical techniques used
3 (304) Mortality Arthroplasty v internal fixation (extracapsular hip fracture) 4 −2 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for inadequate methodologies and for no long-term results. Directness point deducted for disparity in comparators assessed
3 (at least 116) Function and mobility Arthroplasty v internal fixation (extracapsular hip fracture) 4 −2 −1 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for inadequate methodologies and for no long-term results. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results. Directness point deducted for disparity in comparators assessed
3 (298) Orthopaedic complications Arthroplasty v internal fixation (extracapsular hip fracture) 4 −2 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for inadequate methodologies and for no long-term results. Directness point deducted for disparity in comparators assessed
1 (58) Medical complications Arthroplasty v internal fixation (extracapsular hip fracture) 4 −3 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, inadequate methodologies, and no long-term results. Directness point deducted for disparity in comparators assessed
1 (98) Mortality Older nail plates v sliding hip screws 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and for poor quality of RCT
1 (78) Function and mobility Older nail plates v sliding hip screws 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and for poor quality of RCT
1 (78) Pain Older nail plates v sliding hip screws 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and for poor-quality studies
2 (145) Orthopaedic complications Older nail plates v sliding hip screws 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and for poor quality of RCTs in analysis
6 (873) Mortality Extramedullary fixation implants (other than older fixed nail plates) v sliding hip screws 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for methodological flaws in RCTs included in meta-analysis (no ITT analysis in one RCT, and lack of long-term functional data)
2 (147) Function and mobility Extramedullary fixation implants (other than older fixed nail plates) v sliding hip screws 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and for methodological flaws in RCTs included in meta-analysis (no ITT analysis in one RCT, and lack of long-term functional data)
1 (84) Pain Extramedullary fixation implants (other than older fixed nail plates) v sliding hip screws 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for sparse data
6 (936) Orthopaedic complications Extramedullary fixation implants (other than older fixed nail plates) v sliding hip screws 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for methodologically flawed studies and statistical heterogeneity among RCTs in meta-analysis of some outcomes (no ITT analysis in one RCT, and lack of long-term functional data)
2 (266) Medical complications Extramedullary fixation implants (other than older fixed nail plates) v sliding hip screws 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for methodologically flawed studies (lack of long-term functional data)
1 (100) Mortality External fixation v extramedullary fixation 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for sparse data. Directness point deducted for lack of long-term follow-up
3 (at least 85) Function and mobility External fixation v extramedullary fixation 4 −2 0 −2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results (no statistical assessment in some outcomes). Directness points deducted for population differences (differences in age of population and aetiology of fractures) and for no long-term results
2 (140) Medical complications External fixation v extramedullary fixation 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for sparse data. Directness point deducted for no long-term results
24 (3313) Mortality Intramedullary fixation with a short cephalocondylic nail v extramedullary fixation with a sliding hip screw 4 0 0 0 0 High
At least 10 (at least 1260) Function and mobility Intramedullary fixation with a short cephalocondylic nail v extramedullary fixation with a sliding hip screw 4 0 0 0 0 High
8 (897) Pain Intramedullary fixation with a short cephalocondylic nail v extramedullary fixation with a sliding hip screw 4 0 0 0 0 High
At least 28 (at least 3993) Orthopaedic complications Intramedullary fixation with a short cephalocondylic nail v extramedullary fixation with a sliding hip screw 4 0 0 0 0 High
7 (1090) Mortality Intramedullary fixation with condylocephalic nails v extramedullary fixation 4 0 0 0 0 High
8 (1130) Orthopaedic complications Intramedullary fixation with condylocephalic nails v extramedullary fixation 4 0 0 0 0 High
8 (1209) Mortality Different types of intramedullary fixation v each other 4 0 0 −1 0 Moderate Directness point deducted for narrow range of comparators (most comparisons compare one intramedullary fixation device versus Gamma nail)
1 (137) Function and mobility Different types of intramedullary fixation v each other 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for sparse data. Directness point deducted for narrow range of comparators (most comparisons compare one intramedullary fixation device versus Gamma nail)
1 (156) Pain Different types of intramedullary fixation v each other 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for sparse data. Directness point deducted for narrow range of comparators (most comparisons compare one intramedullary fixation device versus Gamma nail)
6 (1024) Orthopaedic complications Different types of intramedullary fixation v each other 4 0 0 −1 0 Moderate Directness point deducted for narrow range of comparators (most comparisons compare one intramedullary fixation device versus Gamma nail)
At least 4 (at least 591) Medical complications Different types of intramedullary fixation v each other 4 0 0 −1 0 Moderate Directness point deducted for narrow range of comparators (most comparisons compare one intramedullary fixation device versus Gamma nail)
What are the effects of perisurgical medical interventions on surgical outcomes and prevention of complications in people with hip fracture?
3 (435) Pain Traction v no traction 4 0 0 0 0 High
2 (229) Orthopaedic complications Traction v no traction 4 0 0 0 0 High
1 (120) Medical complications Traction v no traction 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for sparse data
2 (number not reported) Pain Skeletal traction v skin traction 4 −1 −1 0 0 Low Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results
1 (number not reported) Pain Skin traction v pillow nursing 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting
8 (1668) Mortality Regional v general anaesthesia 4 −1 −1 0 0 Low Quality point deducted for selection bias. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results with different methods of statistical analysis
4 (259) Medical complications Regional v general anaesthesia 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for selection bias
9 (408) Pain Nerve block v no nerve block 4 0 0 −2 0 Low Directness points deducted for uncertainty about clinical benefit and for comparing different types of nerve blocks that were inserted at different times
At least 11 (at least 2500) Orthopaedic complications Prophylaxis with antibiotics v placebo/no prophylaxis 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results
At least 7 (at least 2500) Medical complications Prophylaxis with antibiotics v placebo/no prophylaxis 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results
At least 3 (at least 224) Orthopaedic complications Operative-day (less than 24 hours) antibiotics v longer-duration antibiotics 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results
At least 3 (at least 121) Medical complications Operative-day (less than 24 hours) antibiotics v longer-duration antibiotics 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results
At least 4 (at least 1747) Orthopaedic complications Single-dose regimens v multiple-dose regimens 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (impaired concealment of allocation and no assessor blinding) and incomplete reporting of results
At least 2 (numbers not reported) Medical complications Single-dose regimens v multiple-dose regimens 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for methodological flaws of RCTs included in meta-analysis (impaired concealment of allocation and no assessor blinding) and incomplete reporting of results
8 (730) Mortality Heparin v placebo/no treatment 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for poor follow-up and inadequate diagnosis of DVT/PE
At least 13 (at least 993) Medical complications Heparin v placebo/no treatment 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for poor follow-up and inadequate diagnosis of DVT/PE
3 (242) Mortality LMWH v unfractionated heparin 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for poor follow-up and inadequate diagnosis of PE/DVT
5 (479) Medical complications LMWH v unfractionated heparin 4 −2 −1 0 0 Very low Quality points deducted for poor follow-up and inadequate diagnosis of PE/DVT. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results on re-analysis
1 (200) Medical complications LMWH v LMWH plus pulsatile foot pumps 4 −2 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for poor follow-up and inadequate diagnosis of DVT. Directness point deducted for inclusion of people under 65 years of age
1 (13356) Mortality Antiplatelets v placebo or no treatment 4 0 0 −1 0 Moderate Directness point deducted for non-controlled use of other thromboprophylaxis
11 (14254) Medical complications Antiplatelet agents v placebo or no treatment 4 0 0 −1 0 Moderate Directness point deducted for non-controlled use of other thromboprophylaxis
16 (2191) Medical complications Graduated elastic compression with or without antithrombotics v no prophylaxis 4 0 0 −1 +1 High Directness point deducted for inclusion of people with different underlying conditions. Effect-size point added for OR less than 0.5
4 (256) Mortality Cyclical compression of foot or calf v no compression 4 −2 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for poor allocation concealment and no ITT analysis. Directness point deducted for uncertain benefit on clinical outcomes
5 (487) Medical complications Cyclical compression of foot or calf v no compression 4 −2 0 −1 +1 Low Quality points deducted for poor allocation concealment and no ITT analysis. Directness point deducted for uncertain benefit on clinical outcomes. Effect-size point added for RR less than 0.5
7 (337) Mortality Oral multinutrient feeds v no dietary supplement 4 −3 0 0 0 Very low Quality points deducted for poor allocation concealment, no assessor blinding, and no ITT analysis
3 (139) Medical complications Oral multinutrient feeds v no dietary supplement 4 −3 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, poor allocation concealment, no assessor blinding, and no ITT analysis. Directness point deducted for composite outcome in one study
3 RCTs (at least 314) Mortality Protein supplementation v no protein 4 −3 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for poor allocation concealment, no assessor blinding, and no ITT analysis. Directness point deducted for composite outcome in 1 study
2 (223) Medical complications Protein supplementation v no protein supplementation 4 −3 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for poor allocation concealment, no assessor blinding, and no ITT analysis. Directness point deducted for composite outcome
1 (80) Mortality Additional nutritional supplementation v normal food and beverage 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and methodological limitations
1 (80) Medical complications Additional nutritional supplementation v normal food and beverage 4 −2 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and methodological limitations. Directness point deducted for uncertainty about type of complication
3 (280) Mortality Nasogastric multinutrient feeds v control 4 −1 0 −2 0 Very low Quality point deducted for methodological weaknesses in RCTs included in meta-analysis (inadequate allocation concealment, assessor blinding, and no ITT analysis). Directness points deducted for uncertainty about benefit and for inclusion of people with different nutritional status
1 (57) Mortality Nasogastric multinutrient feeds plus oral multinutrient feeds v control 4 −2 0 −2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and for methodological weaknesses of RCT (inadequate allocation concealment, assessor blinding, and no ITT analysis). Directness points deducted for uncertainty about benefit and for inclusion of people with different nutritional status
1 (57) Medical complications Nasogastric multinutrient feeds plus oral multinutrient feeds v control 4 −2 0 −2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and for methodological weaknesses (inadequate allocation concealment, assessor blinding, and no ITT analysis). Directness points deducted for uncertainty about benefit and for inclusion of people with different nutritional status
What are the effects of rehabilitation interventions and programmes after hip fracture?
2 (353) Mortality Different mobilisation strategies v each other 4 −1 0 −2 0 Very low Quality point deducted for poor follow-up. Directness points deducted for wide range of interventions and comparisons
8 (808) Function and mobility Different mobilisation strategies v each other 4 −2 0 −2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for poor follow-up and flaws in analysis. Directness points deducted for wide range of interventions and comparisons
2 (300) Orthopaedic complications Different mobilisation strategies v each other 4 −2 0 −2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for poor follow-up and flaws in analysis. Directness points deducted for wide range of interventions and comparisons, and for use of composite outcome in one RCT
5 (388) Length of hospital stay Different mobilisation strategies v each other 4 −2 0 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for poor follow-up and flaws in analysis. Directness point deducted for wide range of interventions and comparisons
12 (at least 199) Mortality Co-ordinated multidisciplinary rehabilitation v usual care 4 0 0 −1 0 Moderate Directness point deducted for wide range of interventions and comparisons
12 (at least 2228) Function and mobility Co-ordinated multidisciplinary rehabilitation v usual care 4 0 0 −2 0 Low Directness points deducted for wide range of interventions and comparisons and for use of a composite outcome
1 (199) Orthopaedic complications Co-ordinated multidisciplinary rehabilitation v usual care 4 −2 0 −1 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results
3 (520) Medical complications Co-ordinated multidisciplinary rehabilitation v usual care 4 0 0 −1 0 Moderate Directness point deducted for wide range of interventions and comparisons
2 (147) Function and mobility Early discharge to "hospital at home" v usual hospital care 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results
2 (147) Length of hospital stay Early discharge to "hospital at home" v usual hospital care 4 −2 −1 0 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results
2 (362) Function and mobility Systematic multi-component home-based rehabilitation v usual care 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results. Directness point deducted for uncertainty about benefit

Type of evidence: 4 = RCT; 2 = Observational consistency: similarity of results across studies Directness: generalisability of population or outcomes Effect size: based on relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR). PE, pulmonary embolism.