| Ref (type) | Population | Outcome, Interventions | Results and statistical analysis | Effect size | Favours |
| Daytime sleepiness | |||||
|
RCT |
24 adults with loud snoring and severe OSAHS |
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score (see table 3
)
2 weeks
–3.8 with mandibular advancement devices –0.5 with control oral appliance |
P <0.005 |
Effect size not calculated | mandibular advancement device |
|
RCT Crossover design |
85 people (including 14 women) with a mean ESS score of 11 |
Decrease in sleep latency (see table 3
)
4 weeks
with active mandibular advancement splint with inactive mandibular advancement splint Absolute results not reported |
Decrease in sleep latency for active v inactive treatment: 1.2 minutes 95% CI 0.3 minutes to 2.1 minutes |
Effect size not calculated | active mandibular advancement splint |
|
RCT Crossover design |
85 people (including 14 women) with a mean ESS score of 11 |
Improvement in ESS score
with active mandibular advancement splint with inactive mandibular advancement splint Absolute results not reported |
Improvement in ESS score for active v inactive treatment: 2 points 95% CI 1 point to 3 points |
Effect size not calculated | active mandibular advancement splint |
|
RCT Crossover design |
85 people (including 14 women) with a mean ESS score of 11 |
Proportion of people with normal ESS score
82% with active mandibular advancement splint 62% with inactive mandibular advancement splint Absolute numbers not reported |
P <0.01 |
Effect size not calculated | active mandibular advancement splint |