| Ref (type) | Population | Outcome, Interventions | Results and statistical analysis | Effect size | Favours |
| Nausea | |||||
|
RCT 3-armed trial |
60 women, mean gestational ages 9.6 to 10.8 weeks In review |
Mean nausea score
1 day
with P6 acupressure with no treatment |
WMD –2.40 for P6 acupressure v no treatment 95% CI –3.78 to –1.02 P = 0.0006 for P6 acupressure v no treatment WMD calculated by Clinical Evidence contributor |
Effect size not calculated | P6 acupressure |
|
RCT 3-armed trial |
60 women, mean gestational ages 9.6 to 10.8 weeks In review |
Mean nausea score
6 days
with P6 acupressure with no treatment |
WMD –2.00 for P6 acupressure v no treatment 95% CI –3.37 to –0.63 P = 0.004 for P6 acupressure v no treatment WMD calculated by Clinical Evidence contributor |
Effect size not calculated | P6 acupressure |
|
RCT 3-armed trial |
60 women, mean gestational ages 9.6 to 10.8 weeks In review |
Mean nausea score
14 days
with P6 acupressure with no treatment |
WMD –2.30 for P6 acupressure v no treatment 95% CI –3.79 to –0.81 P = 0.003 for P6 acupressure v no treatment WMD calculated by Clinical Evidence contributor |
Effect size not calculated | P6 acupressure |
|
RCT 3-armed trial |
60 women, mean gestational ages 9.6 to 10.8 weeks In review |
Mean nausea score
1 day
with P6 acupressure with sham acupressure |
WMD –0.40 for P6 acupressure v sham acupressure 95% CI –2.01 to +1.21 P = 0.63 for P6 acupressure v sham acupressure WMD calculated by Clinical Evidence contributor |
Not significant | |
|
RCT 3-armed trial |
60 women, mean gestational ages 9.6 to 10.8 weeks In review |
Mean nausea score
6 days
with P6 acupressure with sham acupressure |
WMD –1.4 for P6 acupressure v sham acupressure 95% CI –2.89 to –0.09 P = 0.07 for P6 acupressure v sham acupressure WMD calculated by Clinical Evidence contributor |
Not significant | |
|
RCT 3-armed trial |
60 women, mean gestational ages 9.6 to 10.8 weeks In review |
Mean nausea score
14 days
with P6 acupressure with sham acupressure |
WMD –1.7 for P6 acupressure v sham acupressure 95% CI –3.25 to –0.15 P = 0.03 for P6 acupressure v sham acupressure WMD calculated by Clinical Evidence contributor |
Effect size not calculated | P6 acupressure |
|
Systematic review |
350 women, mean gestational ages 7.2 to 10.0 weeks Data from 1 RCT |
Proportion of women reporting nausea
23/119 (19%) with finger acupressure 108/231 (47%) with control |
RR 0.41 95% CI 0.28 to 0.60 P = 0.005 See further information on studies for details of placebo effect |
Moderate effect size | finger acupressure |
|
Systematic review |
273 women, mean gestational ages 8 to 11 weeks 5 RCTs in this analysis |
Proportion of women reporting nausea
32/102 (31%) with wristband acupressure 60/106 (57%) with control |
RR 0.55 95% CI 0.38 to 0.77 P = 0.007 See further information on studies for details of placebo effect |
Small effect size | acupressure |
|
RCT |
138 women randomised at 13 weeks' gestation |
Frequency and severity of nausea
with acupressure given by a wristband to the P6 acupoint with sham acupressure wristband |
Data were not reported in a way that allowed further statistical calculation |
||
|
RCT 3-armed trial |
75 pregnant women suffering from nausea with or without vomiting, and who were unable to receive conventional treatment, gestational age range 5 to 12 weeks |
Nausea (measured using a visual analogue score: 10 cm long vertical and horizontal lines with a scale ranging from 0 = no symptoms to 10 = worst possible symptom)
4 to 6 days
with acupressure (an acupressure band applied to acupoint P6 on days 4 to 6 and removed before going to bed) with placebo (a band applied to a sham acupressure point on the upper side of the wrists on days 4 to 6 and removed before going to bed) Absolute results not reported |
P >0.05 for acupressure v placebo See further information on studies for methodological limitations |
Not significant | |
| Vomiting | |||||
|
Systematic review |
250 women, mean gestational ages 8 to 11 weeks 5 RCTs in this analysis |
Proportion of women reporting vomiting
29/107 (27%) with wristband acupressure 58/131 (44%) with control |
RR 0.45 95% CI 0.32 to 0.63 P <0.001 See further information on studies for details of placebo effect |
Moderate effect size | wristband acupressure |
|
RCT 3-armed trial |
75 pregnant women suffering from nausea with or without vomiting, and who were unable to receive conventional treatment, gestational age range 5 to 12 weeks |
Vomiting (measured using a visual analogue score: 10 cm long vertical and horizontal lines with a scale ranging from 0 = no symptoms to 10 = worst possible symptom)
4 to 6 days
with acupressure (an acupressure band applied to acupoint P6 on days 4 to 6 and removed before going to bed) with placebo (a band applied to a sham acupressure point on the upper side of the wrists on days 4 to 6 and removed before going to bed) Absolute results not reported |
P >0.05 for acupressure v placebo See further information on studies for methodological limitations |
Not significant | |
| Nausea and vomiting (composite) | |||||
|
Systematic review |
285 women 2 RCTs in this analysis |
Proportion of women reporting morning sickness (not further defined)
37/145 (25%) with acupressure 61/140 (43%) with sham acupressure |
RR 0.57 95% CI 0.38 to 0.86 |
Small effect size | acupressure |
|
RCT |
97 women, 8 to 12 weeks' gestation In review |
Duration of nausea and vomiting
with active wristband acupressure with sham wristband acupressure |
WMD –1.89 hours/12-hour cycle 95% CI –3.45 hours/12-hour cycle to –0.33 hours/12-hour cycle |
Effect size not calculated | active wristband acupressure |
|
RCT |
97 women, 8 to 12 weeks' gestation In review |
Intensity of nausea and vomiting
with active wristband acupressure with sham wristband acupressure |
WMD –0.25 95% CI –0.62 to +0.12 |
Not significant |