Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 1;2009:0406.
Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Eradication rates

Systematic review
2862 people
18 RCTs in this analysis
Eradication rates
1174/1456 (81%) with nitroimidazole-based regimens
1133/1406 (81%) with amoxicillin-based regimens

OR 1.00
95% CI 0.83 to 1.22
Significant statistical heterogeneity among RCTs (P = 0.14; statistical heterogeneity defined by the review as significant if P <0.2)
Not significant

Systematic review
893 people
7 RCTs in this analysis
Eradication rates
360/443 (81%) with amoxicillin-based regimens containing lower-dose clarithromycin (250 mg twice daily)
388/450 (86%) with nitroimidazole-based regimens containing lower-dose clarithromycin (250 mg twice daily)

Peto OR 0.68
95% CI 0.48 to 0.98
Small effect size nitroimidazole-based regimens

RCT
3-armed trial
120 people with H pylori infection and dyspeptic symptoms or a history of peptic ulcer Eradication rates
83% with 7-day metronidazole-based regimen (containing omeprazole plus clarithromycin)
92% with 7-day amoxicillin-based regimen (containing omeprazole plus clarithromycin)
Absolute numbers not reported

Significance not assessed

RCT
People with H pylori infection and active peptic ulcers or a history of peptic ulcer Eradication rates
73%, 95% CI 65% to 81% with metronidazole-based regimen
65%, 95% CI 57% to 75% with amoxicillin-based regimen
Absolute numbers not reported

Significance of between-group difference not assessed

RCT
People with H pylori infection and active peptic ulcers or a history of peptic ulcer Eradication rates
81%, 95% CI 73% to 88% with metronidazole-based regimens
65%, 95% CI 56% to 73% with amoxicillin-based regimens
Absolute numbers not reported

Significance of between-group difference not assessed