Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2010 Apr;63(4):1092–1097. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22223

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Spatially varying fat-water separation was performed on a healthy volunteer at 3T (TE=8ms, TR=14ms, flip angle=45°, FOV=34cm, matrix size=256×256, slice thickness=8mm). The spatially-varying contrast was adjusted as follows: (a) left: fat+water, right: water-only (Rshift=0); (b) left: water-only, right: no excitation (Rshift =0.25); (c) left: no excitation, right: fat-only (Rshift =0.5); (d) left: fat-only, right: fat+water (Rshift =0.75); Fig. (a–d) were all obtained using a 5×560μs 2DRF pulse and FOE=2 × FOV. The four different contrasts obtained were analogous to those described with FOV1 to FOV4 in Fig. 2d.