Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 5;2008:1111.

Table.

GRADE evaluation of interventions for plantar heel pain and fasciitis

Important outcomes Pain relief, functional improvement, quality of life, adverse effects
Number of studies (participants) Outcome Comparison Type of evidence Quality Consistency Directness Effect size GRADE Comment
What are the effects of treatments for plantar heel pain?
1 (91) Functional improvement Casted orthoses v placebo/no treatment 4 –1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for sparse data
1 (91) Pain relief Casted orthoses v placebo/no treatment 4 –1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for sparse data
1 (89) Pain relief Casted orthoses v prefabricated orthoses 4 –1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for sparse data
1 (89) Functional improvement Casted orthoses v prefabricated orthoses 4 –1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for sparse data
1 (103) Pain relief Casted orthoses plus pad plus taping v heel pad plus pain medication 4 –2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and no intention-to-treat analysis
1 (236) Pain relief Casted orthoses plus stretching exercises v heel pad plus stretching exercises 4 –1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results
1(222) Pain relief Casted orthoses v night splints 4 –2 0 –1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for incomplete reporting of results and uncertainty about intention-to-treat analysis. Directness points deducted for differences in withdrawal rates between groups
1 (43) Pain relief Casted orthoses v orthosis plus night splints 4 –3 0 0 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, incomplete reporting of results and lack of blinding
1 (91) Pain relief Corticosteroid injection plus local anaesthesia v local anaesthetic (short term) 4 –3 0 –2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, lack of placebo controls, no intention-to-treat analysis and poor follow-up. Directness points deducted for uncertainty of clinical relevance and heterogeneity between interventions
2 (97) Pain relief Corticosteroid injection plus local anaesthesia v heel pad alone 4 –3 –1 –1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, lack of placebo controls, no intention-to-treat analysis and poor follow-up. Consistency point deducted for different results at different endpoints. Directness point deducted for heterogeneity between interventions
1 (80) Pain relief Corticosteroid injection plus local anaesthesia v corticosteroid plus local anaesthetic plus heel pad 4 –3 0 –2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, lack of placebo controls, no intention-to-treat analysis and poor follow-up. Directness points deducted for uncertainty of clinical relevance and heterogeneity between interventions
1 (80) Pain relief Corticosteroid injection plus local anaesthesia plus heel pad v heel pad 4 –3 0 –1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, lack of placebo controls, no intention-to-treat analysis and poor follow-up. Directness point deducted for heterogeneity between interventions
1 (91) Pain relief Corticosteroid injection plus local anaesthesia v local anaesthetic (medium term) 4 –3 0 –2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, lack of placebo controls, no intention-to-treat analysis and poor follow-up. Directness points deducted for uncertainty of clinical relevance and heterogeneity between interventions
1 (80) Pain relief Corticosteroid injection plus local anaesthesia v heel pad alone 4 –3 0 –1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, lack of placebo controls, no intention-to-treat analysis and poor follow-up. Directness point deducted for heterogeneity between interventions
1 (80) Pain relief Corticosteroid injection plus local anaesthesia v corticosteroid plus local anaesthetic plus heel pad 4 –3 –1 –2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, lack of placebo controls, no intention-to-treat analysis and poor follow-up. Consistency point deducted for different results at different endpoints. Directness points deducted for uncertainty of clinical relevance and heterogeneity between interventions
1 (103) Pain relief Corticosteroid injection plus local anaesthesia plus NSAIDs v heel pad plus paracetamol 4 –3 0 –2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, lack of placebo controls, no intention-to-treat analysis and poor follow-up. Directness point deducted for heterogeneity between interventions
1 (103) Pain relief Corticosteroid injection plus local anaesthesia plus NSAIDs v pad plus taping plus orthoses 4 –3 0 –2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, lack of placebo controls, no intention-to-treat analysis and poor follow-up. Directness point deducted for heterogeneity between interventions
8 (1183) Pain relief Extracorporeal shock wave therapy v placebo 4 –1 –1 –1 0 Very low Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results. Directness point deducted for uncertainty of clinical relevance of effect
1 (32) Pain relief Lasers v placebo 4 –2 0 –1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results. Directness point deducted for uncertainty about outcome measured
2 (133) Pain relief Taping v placebo/no treatment 4 –1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for sparse data
1 (92) Functional improvement Taping v placebo/no treatment 4 –1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for sparse data
1 (116) Pain relief Night splints plus NSAIDs v NSAIDs 4 –2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results
1 (236) Pain relief Stretching exercises v orthoses plus stretching exercises 4 –1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results
1 (166) Pain relief Stretching exercises v heel pad plus stretching exercises 4 –1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for sparse data
1 (101) Pain relief Plantar fascia stretching plus heel pad v Achilles tendon stretching plus heel pad 4 –2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and for not reporting treatment adherence rates
1 (19) Pain relief Ultrasound v sham ultrasound 4 –1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for sparse data

Type of evidence: 4 = RCT; 2 = Observational; 1 = Non-analytical/expert opinion. Consistency: similarity of results across studies Directness: generaliseability of population or outcomes Effect size: based on relative risk or odds ratio