Table.
Important outcomes | Symptom relief, quality of life, adverse effects | ||||||||
Number of studies (participants) | Outcome | Comparison | Type of evidence | Quality | Consistency | Directness | Effect size | GRADE | Comment |
What are the effects of interventions to prevent or treat constipation in pregnancy? | |||||||||
1 (40) | Symptom relief | Increased fibre intake v no treatment | 4 | –1 | 0 | –2 | +2 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data. Directness points deducted for unspecific definition of constipation and for few comparators. Effect-size point added for odds ratio less than 0.2 |
1 (140) | Symptom relief | Stimulant laxatives v bulk-forming laxatives | 4 | –3 | 0 | 0 | +1 | Low | Quality points deducted for sparse data, uncertainty about randomisation, and no clear end-point. Effect-size point added for odds ratio less than 0.5 |
What are the effects of interventions to prevent or treat haemorrhoids in pregnancy? | |||||||||
2 (150) | Symptom relief | Rutosides v placebo | 4 | –2 | 0 | 0 | +2 | High | Quality points deducted for sparse data, and for not reporting method of randomisation. Effect-size points added for RR less than 0.2 |
What are the effects of interventions to prevent or treat heartburn in pregnancy? | |||||||||
1 (50) | Symptom relief | Antacids v placebo | 4 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
Type of evidence: 4 = RCT; 2 = Observational; 1 = Non-analytical/expert opinion. Consistency: similarity of results across studies Directness: generalisability of population or outcomes Effect size: based on relative risk or odds ratio