Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 3;2008:2001.

Table.

GRADE evaluation of interventions for acute renal failure

Important outcomes Kidney injury, mortality, adverse effects
Number of studies (participants) Outcome Comparison Type of evidence Quality Consistency Directness Effect size GRADE Comment
What are the effects of interventions to prevent acute renal failure in people at high risk?
31 (5146) Kidney injury Low-osmolality contrast media v high-osmolality contrast media 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results
2 (365) Kidney injury Intravenous sodium chloride 0.9% v oral fluids 4 0 −1 0 0 Moderate Consistency point deducted for conflicting results
1 (1620) Kidney injury Sodium chloride 0.9% v sodium chloride 0.45% 4 0 0 0 0 High
1 (45) Kidney injury Sodium chloride 0.45% v restricted fluids 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results
1 (36) Kidney injury Inpatient v outpatient fluid regimens 4 −2 0 −2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results. Directness points deducted for differences in amount of fluids administered and uncertainty about clinical relevance of outcome measured
17 (2201) Kidney injury Acetylcysteine v control in the prevention of contrast nephropathy 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results. Consistency point deducted for heterogeneity between RCTs and added for dose response. Directness point deducted for differences in timing and dose administration
1 (354) Mortality Acetylcysteine v control in the prevention of contrast nephropathy 4 0 +1 −1 0 High Consistency point added for dose response. Directness point deducted for composite outcome
2 (337) Kidney injury Acetylcysteine v placebo in the prevention of perioperative acute renal failure 4 0 0 0 0 High
1 (142) Kidney injury Acetylcysteine v placebo in the prevention of acute renal failure after hypotension 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for sparse data
2 (420) Kidney injury Iso-osmolar contrast media v low osmolar contrast media 4 0 0 −1 0 Moderate Directness point deducted for not using standardised volumes of contrast media or fluid regimens
4 (803) Kidney injury Single-dose aminoglycosides v multiple doses 4 −1 −1 0 0 Low Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results. Consistency point deducted for different results for people with different disease severities
1 (119) Kidney injury Sodium bicarbonate v sodium chloride 4 −2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and no intention-to-treat analysis
3 (770) Kidney injury Fenoldopam v placebo 4 0 0 0 0 High
3 (770) Mortality Fenoldopam v placebo 4 0 0 0 0 High
2 (180) Kidney injury Fenoldopam v dopamine 4 −2 −1 0 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results
11 (1094) Kidney injury Fenoldopam v other treatments or control 4 −3 −1 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for incomplete reporting of results and methodological weaknesses. Consistency point deducted for heterogeneity between RCTs. Directness point deducted for heterogenous combined control
1 (78) Kidney injury Mannitol plus intravenous fluids v intravenous fluids 4 −1 0 −1 0 Low Quality point deducted for sparse data. Directness point deducted for multiple comparisons
2 (206) Kidney injury Renal replacement therapy (haemofiltration) v isotonic saline 4 −1 0 −2 0 Very low Quality point deducted for methodological weaknesses. Directness points deducted for differences in treatments provided to both groups and for uncertainty about benefit
1 (114) Mortality Renal replacement therapy (haemofiltration) v isotonic saline 4 −2 0 −2 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and methodological weaknessess. Directness points deducted for differences in treatments provided to both groups
7 (480) Kidney injury Theophylline or aminophylline v control in radiocontrast-induced nephropathy 4 −2 −1 −1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for incomplete reporting of results and uncertainty about hydration status of people receiving radiocontrast agent and for uncertainty about heterogeneity between studies. Directness point deducted for uncertainty about clinical significance
1 (56) Kidney injury Theophylline v sodium chloride 0.9% after CABG 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for sparse data
1 (210) Kidney injury Calcium channel blockers v placebo in people receiving live or cadaveric kidney transplant 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results
7 (349) Kidney injury Calcium channel blockers v no calcium channel blockers in people receiving cadaveric kidney transplant 4 −2 −1 0 0 Very Low Quality points deducted for incomplete reporting of results and for not reporting loss to follow-up or duration. Consistency point deducted for heterogeneity between RCTs
5 (284) Mortality Calcium channel blockers v no calcium channel blockers in people receiving cadaveric kidney transplant 4 −2 −1 0 0 Very Low Quality points deducted for incomplete reporting of results and for not reporting loss to follow-up or treatment duration. Consistency point deducted for heterogeneity between RCTs
at least 10 RCTs (at least 618 people) Kidney injury Dopamine v placebo 4 0 0 0 0 High
12 (832) Mortality Dopamine v placebo 4 0 0 0 0 High
3 (255) Kidney injury Loop diuretics v fluids alone 4 0 0 −1 0 Moderate Directness point deducted for differences in treatment protocols
2 (202) Mortality Loop diuretics v fluids alone 4 0 0 −1 0 Moderate Directness point deducted for differences in treatment protocols
2 (3067) Kidney injury Natriuretic peptides v placebo 4 −1 −1 −2 0 Very low Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results. Directness points deducted for composite outcome and for using low doses and long treatment durations
What are the effects of treatments for critically ill people with acute renal failure?
2 (531) Mortality High-dose continuous renal replacement therapy v low-dose continuous renal replacement therapy 4 0 0 –1 0 Moderate Consistency point added for dose response but deducted for conflicting results. Direcntess point deducted for comparing people with different disease severities
1 (206) Mortality Haemofiltration v haemofiltration plus dialysis 4 0 0 0 0 High
6 (624) Kidney injury Renal replacement therapy (continuous) v intermittent renal haemodialysis 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results
6 (624) Mortality Renal replacement therapy (continuous) v intermittent renal haemodialysis 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results
1 (360) Mortality Renal replacement therapy (intermittent haemodialysis) v continuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration 4 0 0 −1 0 Moderate Directness point deducted for uncertainty about applicability to usual practice
7 + 15 studies (1589) Mortality Dialysis membranes (synthetic) v cellulose-based 4 −3 −1 0 0 Very low Quality points deducted for incomplete reporting of results, methodological weaknesses, and for including non-RCTs. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results
at least 2 RCTs (at least 422 people) Kidney injury Loop diuretics v control 4 −3 0 0 0 Very low Quality points deducted for poor reporting and methodological weaknesses
5 (at least 574 people) Mortality Loop diuretics v control 4 −3 0 0 0 Very low Quality points deducted for poor reporting and methodological weaknesses
10 (618) ) Kidney injury Dopamine v placebo 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for inclusion of trials
1 RCT + 11 trials (832) Mortality Dopamine v placebo 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for inclusion of trials
3 (900) Kidney injury Natriuretic peptides v placebo 4 −1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results

Type of evidence: 4 = RCT; 2 = Observational Consistency: similarity of results across studies Directness: generalisability of population or outcomes Effect size: based on relative risk or odds ratio