Skip to main content
. 2008 Nov 17;2008:1120.

Table.

GRADE evaluation of interventions for gout

Important outcomes Symptom severity, recurrence of gout, adverse effects
Number of studies (participants) Outcome Comparison Type of evidence Quality Consistency Directness Effect size GRADE Comment
What are the effects of treatments for acute gout?
1 (43) Symptom severity Colchicine v placebo 4 –1 0 –1 0 Low Quality point deducted for sparse data. Directness point deducted for narrow inclusion criteria
1 (90) Symptom severity Corticosteroids v NSAIDS 4 –1 –1 0 0 Low Quality point deducted for sparse data. Consistency point deducted for different results at different end points
1 (31) Symptom severity Corticosteroids v corticotropin 4 –1 0 –1 0 Low Quality point deducted for sparse data. Directness point deducted for only assessing one corticosteroid
1 (30) Symptom severity NSAIDs v placebo 4 –2 –1 –1 +1 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and statistical flaws. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results at different end points. Directness point deducted for assessing only one drug. Effect-size point added for RR greater than 2
6 (548) Symptom severity NSAIDs v each other 4 0 0 –1 0 Moderate Directness point deducted for assessment of only some NSAIDs
What are the effects of treatments to prevent gout in people with prior acute episodes?
1 RCT Recurrence of gout Sulfinpyrazone plus colchicine v colchicine plus placebo 4 –2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results
1 (760) Recurrence of gout Xanthine oxidase inhibitors v each other 4 0 –1 0 0 Moderate Consistency point deducted for conflicting results at different end points and with different doses
1 (43) Recurrence of gout Xanthine oxidase inhibitors alone v xanthine oxidase inhibitors plus prophylactic drugs 4 –2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and for uncertainty about basis of statistical analysis

Type of evidence: 4 = RCT; 2 = Observational; Consistency: similarity of results across studies. Directness: generalisability of population or outcomes.Effect size: based on relative risk or odds ratio.