Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech. 2010 Apr 22;43(10):1864–1869. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.033

Figure 6.

Figure 6

A) Circumferential incremental elastic modulus (Einc) and B) Local area compliance (CA) from 10 – 30 mmHg for CTL and HPH extralobar PAs. □ (CTL-Normal), Inline graphic (CTL-Constricted), Inline graphic (CTL-Dilated), ■ (HPH-Normal), Inline graphic (HPH-Constricted), Inline graphic (HPH-Dilated). * P<0.05 vs. CTL condition; *** P<0.0005 vs. CTL condition; † P<0.05 vs. Normal state; ††† P<0.0005 vs. Normal state. SMC constriction decreased Einc, but also decreased diameter and increased wall thickness, such that CA changes were only significant in HPH PAs.