Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 21;5(7):e11482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011482

Figure 2. Contrasting face and shoe recognition for rotated images.

Figure 2

In the recognition of rotated images, CP participants performed worse than controls for for faces (Exp. 3) but not for shoes (Exp. 4). This was tested for every rotation angle separately (A with significance values according to a Wilcoxon rank sum test). A comparison of individual residuals, which account for differences in the experimental setup, revealed that the deficit is selective for all CPs (B). Note that the magnitude of group differences observed for face recognition didn't change with rotation angle (Likelihood-ratio test, Inline graphic).