Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 22.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Cell. 2009 Aug;17(2):268–278. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.06.007

Table 2.

Phenotype of 35S:FT-GFP alone and in combination with 35S:miR156a or 35S:SPL3Δ

Genotype Number of Rosette Leaves Number of Cauline Leaves Number of Secondary Inflorescence
Wild type (Col) 11.9 ± 0.3 (12) 2.9 ± 0.1 (12) 2.9 ± 0.1 (12)
35S:FT-GFP 4.2 ± 0.2 (16) 2.0 ± 0.1(16) 2.1 ± 0.1 (16)
35S:FT-GFP x 35S:miR156a 3.9 ± 0.2 (24) 2.2 ± 0.1 (24) 1.8 ± 0.1 (24)
35S:miR156a x Col 39.1 ± 1.9 (13) ND ND
35S:FT-GFP x Col 3.3 ± 0.1 (57) 1.3 ± 0.1 (57) 1.3 ± 0.1 (57)
35S:FT-GFP x 35S:SPL3 2.0 ± 0 (29) 1.4 ± 0.1 (29) 1.0 ± 0.1 (29)
35S:SPL3 x Col 5.1 ± 0.2 (15) 1.5 ± 0.1 (15) 1.5 ± 0.1 (15)

Shown is the mean ± SEM (n). ND denotes not determined.

Statistically significant difference (Student's t test, P < 0.005) was detected between marked genotypes.

Plants were grown on soil at 22°C in LDs