Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 28;8:39. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-39

Table 4.

Subgroup analyses by study design and type of control

Subgroups SBP DBP
Mean difference in mmHg (95% CI) P I2 Mean difference in mmHg (95% CI) P I2
Study design Crossover [10,12,13,18,20,21,23] -4.91 (-7.94, -1.88) 0.002 80% -3.24 (-5.36, -1.12) 0.003 67%
Parallel [11,15-17,21-23] -2.01 (-3.42, -0.60) 0.005 9% -1.20 (-2.29, -0.11) 0.03 12%
Parallela [11,15,17,21-23] -0.43 (-2.80, 1.94) 0.72 0% -0.25 (-1.83, 1.33) 0.75 0%
Type of control Flavanol-free: white chocolate, milk, pills [11,15,17,20,21] -4.21 (-6.65, -1.77) 0.0007 82% -2.81 (-4.52, -1.10) 0.001 70%
Low-flavanol: drink, bar, tablet [10,13,16,18,22-24] 0.74 (-2.92, 4.40) 0.69 53% -0.38 (-2.00, 1.24) 0.65 0%

SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; mmHg, millimetre mercury; CI, confidence interval; P, probability value (P < 0.05 statistically significant); I2, heterogeneity test.

aSensitivity analysis excluding trial [16], as this trial used a notably lower dose and longer duration than the other trials included in the meta-analysis.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure