Table 2. Overview of clinical trials of pharmacotherapy for stress incontinence in men.
Medication | n (Men) | Study type | Outcome | Author |
Alpha agonists | ||||
Ephedrine | 20 (+18 women) | Case series | 27 / 38 (71.1%) no incontinence or drops only | Diokno et al. (e3) |
Midodrine | 5 | Case series | 5 / 5 (100%) improvement | Nito et al. (e4) |
Beta agonists | ||||
Glenbuterol | 14 | Cohort study | 9 / 14 (64.3%) reduced use of incontinence pads | Noguchi et al. (e5) |
Glenbuterol | 72 | Case series | 55 / 72 (76.3%) fully continent | Zozikov et al. (e6) |
Serotonin- and noradrenaline-reuptake inhibitors | ||||
Imipramine | 5 | Case series | 3 / 5 (60%) improvement or cure | Reid et al. (e7) |
Duloxetine | 20 | Case series | 7 / 18 (38.9%)* reduced use of incontinence pads | Schlenker et al. (e8) |
Duloxetine | 18 | Case series | 46.7% less loss of urine (from 124 to 58 g by PAD test) | Zahariou et al. (e9) |
Duloxetine | 112 | Randomized trial | 39 / 50 (78%) (treatment arm) vs. 27 / 52 (51.9%) (placebo arm)* Reduced use of incontinence pads at 16 weeks | Filocamo et al. (12) |
*1 significant differences