Table 5. Continence state and complications after the implantation of an artificial sphincter system.
Author | n | Study type | Outcome |
Perez et al. (19) | 75 | Case series | 56 / 75 (75%) max. 1 incontinence pad |
Fleshner et al. (18) | 30 | Case series | 26 / 30 (87%) max. 1 incontinence pad |
Trigo-Rocha et al. (20) | 40 | Prospective trial | 36 / 40 (90%) max. 1 incontinence pad, 8 / 40 (20%) revisions at 53 months |
Montague et al. (21) | 166 | Case series | Up to 10% infection of the system by 41 months |
Elliott et al. (24) | 400 | Case series | 1–3% urethral erosion at 68.8 months |
Litwiller et al. (23) | 65 | Case series | 3–9% urethral atrophy at 23.4 months |
Leo et al. (25) | 144 | Case series | 12 / 144 (8%) system defects by 28 months |