Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 7.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jun 4;55(13):3659–3673. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/13/006

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5

DQE for four incident beam angles (0°, 2.24°, 4.47°, and 6.69°) using 10 – 40 mm thick, segmented BGO and CsI:T1 detectors with polymer septal walls. In this figure and in figure 6, for each detector configuration, the progressive degradation in DQE shown by the various lines corresponds to increasing incident beam angle. Note that the results are compared to DQE measured from the conventional EPID.