Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 23;5(7):e11741. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011741

Table 4. Relationship between emm type and ST.

emm type No. of isolates Associated STs No. of STs No. of CCSLV a No. of CCDLV b No. of distant STsc
stG6 13 15, 24, 25, 44, 52, 58, 62, 63 8 4 2 2
stG480 11 7, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41, 67 7 2 2 2
stC1400 8 3, 28, 34, 46, 64, 66 6 3 1 4
stG485 8 17, 29, 37, 47, 55, 69 6 3 2 2
stG643 9 8, 12, 22, 48, 52, 73 6 3 4 5
stG652 7 15, 32, 59, 61, 63, 71 6 3 2
stC6979 8 9, 19, 20, 54, 80 5 4 4 3
stC36 6 4, 45, 49, 50, 68 5 2 1 2
stC74a 15 17, 29, 70, 77 4 2 3 3
stC839 7 3, 8, 15, 78 4 3 2 3
stG166b 5 15, 25, 56, 65 4 2 2 2
stG11 5 6, 8, 42 3 1 1
stG2078 9 15, 17, 72 3 2 2 2
stG245 3 15, 21, 36 3 2 2 2
stG4831 3 74, 75, 76 3 1 0
stG62647 9 20, 33, 60 3 1 1
stG6792 6 4, 31, 51 3 1 1
emm57 3 3, 57 2 1 0 2
stC5344 3 4, 43 2 1 1
stC6746 2 5, 27 2 1 0
stC9431 2 13, 14 2 1 1
stG5063 2 2, 34 2 1 0
stG840 2 26, 30 2 1 1
stG7882 2 4, 18 2 1 1
a

CCSLV – Clonal complex based on Single Locus Variant relationships.

b

CCDLV – Clonal complex based on Double Locus Variant relationships.

c

Number of STs sharing the same emm type and differing from all other STs harboring that emm type at greater than five housekeeping alleles.