Skip to main content
. 2010 May 4;1(2):1–9. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1015

Figure 5. Wetting behaviour for SD-type LLT.

Figure 5

(a) Pattern evolution during SD-type LLT in the presence of a TPP crystal (formed at 235 K), which is observed with phase-contrast microscopy at 213 K (<TSD). Insets show the images observed with polarizing microscopy under a crossed Nicols condition. The white bar corresponds to 20 μm. (b) Pattern evolution during SD-type LLT in the presence of a PET surface, which is observed with phase-contrast microscopy at 213 K. The black dotted lines indicate the location of the surface of PET. The white bar corresponds to 10 μm. For both cases of a and b, the amplitude of the order parameter fluctuations increases with time initially, but later decays with time, and finally becomes a homogeneous liquid II state21,22. The characteristic lengthscale of fluctuations keeps increasing with time. We cannot see any indication of surface-wetting effects on LLT at least on a macroscopic level. (c) The intensity profile I(x, y, t) obtained from the micrographs in b, along the x direction at y=5 μm (near surface) and y=100 μm (in bulk). The PET surface is located at y=0 μm. (d) The intensity profile in b along the y direction, which is averaged along the x direction over 100 μm. Here Inline graphic (L: the length along x). We cannot see any distinct density profile near the surface (y=0 μm) (for example, a density wave and/or a wetting layer), suggesting the absence of distinct surface-wetting effects.