Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Sin. 2009;19(4):1641–1663.

Table 1.

Overall sensitivity and specificity of methods using three types of priors,under the full model, and BMA using the g-prior (gBMA), by ten-fold cross validation, on set (a): p = 340, n = 1260 and set (b): p = 1364, n = 1260. %pN F R: percentage of predicted nucleosome-free regions by each method; ave.corr: average percent correct classification = (Sens + Spec)/2, averaged over the ten cross-validation data sets. The average percentage of NFRs in the data sets was 43%. Note: It was not possible to use the gBMA procedure for set (b) due to the massive computational cost.

Set Prior Range[E(β|y)] %pN F R ave.corr
(a) IMR (−0.295, 0.443) 0.708 0.664
N(0, I) (−0.192, 0.161) 0.123 0.509
N(0, 106 I) (−0.188, 0.168) 0.111 0.475
gBMA (−8.778, 11.437) 0.569 0.670

(b) IMR (−0.518, 0.535) 0.387 0.447
N(0, I) (−1.142, 0.496) 0
N(0, 106 I) (−3.424, 2.179) 0