Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 29;25(5):1653–1661. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp668

Table 3.

Overall performance of eGFRCG, eGFRMC, eGFRMDRD and eGFRCKD-EPI at 1 year

Bias(mL/min) IQRa Relative Bias(%) R2 RMSEb Within 10%of iGFR Within 30%of iGFR Within 50%of iGFR
Steroid free (n = 81)
eGFRCG 0.23 ± 15.2 16.0 8.52 ± 45.1% 0.32 15.1 41.7% 75.0% 88.1%
(1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)
eGFRMC 7.80 ± 17.7 20.8 21.46 ± 49.2% 0.33 19.3 32.1% 61.9% 83.3%
(Rank) (3) (3) (1) (1) (2) (1)
eGFRMDRD 2.40 ± 15.7 17.2 11.24 ± 40.9% 0.37 15.8 39.3% 75.0% 86.9%
(Rank) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)
eGFRCKD-EPI 6.91 ± 15.9 18.1 19.99 ± 44.8% 0.37 17.3 33.3% 66.7% 83.3%
(Rank) (2) (2) (1) (1) (2) (2)
Steroid maintenance (n = 16)
eGFRCG 4.79 ± 17.0 18.4 13.32 ± 32.8% 0.05 17.2 25.0% 81.3% 81.3%
eGFRMC 9.35 ± 17.3 19.2 20.45 ± 35.4% 0.08 19.2 18.8% 68.8% 75.0%
eGFRMDRD 3.71 ± 13.6 16.0 9.99 ± 26.9% 0.11 13.8 43.8% 81.3% 87.5%
eGFRCKD-EPI 9.47 ± 14.8 15.4 20.52 ± 30.5% 0.12 17.2 18.8% 68.8% 87.5%

Rank of performance based on paired tests: 1 = Best. Ties are assigned the same rank. CG, Cockcroft–Gault; MC, Mayo Clinic. aIQR, interquartile range of differences, bRMSE, root mean squared error of differences. Ranking was not performed for the 16 subjects on no steroids due to the small n.