Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Jul 3;39(2):114–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.05.008

Table 4.

Comparisons of OP With AUD and OP Without AUD Subsamples on ASI composite scores

ASI Composite
Score Domain
Aggregate Subsample
of OP With AUD
(n = 420)
Aggregate Subsample
of OP Without AUD
(n = 675)
Subsample
Comparison

N %^ N %^ Odds-Ratio (95% C.I.)^
Medical
 = 0.00 167 37.4% 328 48.4% 0.62* (0.43, 0.90)
 >= 0.30a 183 42.1% 234 38.0% 1.18 (0.87, 1.61)

Legal
 = 0.00 230 58.9% 413 66.4% 0.75b (0.55, 1.02)
 >= 0.17a 140 32.2% 168 27.4% 1.29 (0.93, 1.78)

Family/Social
 = 0.00 164 39.7% 352 55.6% 0.51*** (0.37, 0.71)
 >= 0.15a 207 50.8% 230 37.7% 1.66*** (1.23, 2.22)

Psychiatric
 = 0.00 105 25.0% 222 34.9% 0.63*** (0.49, 0.82)
 >= 0.22a 238 58.4% 295 48.7% 1.45* (1.09, 1.95)

Employment
 = 1 148 36.9% 238 34.6% 1.02 (0.75, 1.40)
 >= 0.70a 224 54.8% 354 53.7% 1.01 (0.75, 1.34)

Drug
 >= .26a 244 63.8% 370 53.6% 1.58* (1.09, 2.30)

Notes:

Reference group for odds-ratios is the OP without AUD subsample.

a

denotes median published composite score value for opiate treatment clientele, per McLellan et.al (2006).

b

denotes comparison with trend toward statistical significance (p = .063).

^

Weighted results by meta-analysis

***

p<.001,

**

p<.01,

*

p<.05