Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2010 Aug 1;116(15):3577–3586. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25095

TABLE 3.

Cox Regression Analysis to Assess Prognostic Significance of MUC4 Expression

Prognostic variables Indicator of poor prognosis Hazard ratio 95% (confidence intervals) p-value
Overall
Expression of MUC4
 MUC4 (low vs. high expression) high expression 2.07 (1.14–3.75) 0.017
Tumor stage
  I vs. II II 1.34 (0.46–3.85) 0.582
  I vs. III III 4.95 (1.84–13.27) 0.001
  I vs. IV IV 14.15 (4.64–43.10) < 0.0001
Tumor grade
 high vs. low high grade 1.47 (0.77–2.78) 0.243
Tumor location
 proximal vs. distal colon proximal colon 0.92 (0.64–1.31) 0.644
Tumor size
 > 5 cm vs. ≤ 5 cm > 5 cm 1.12 (0.63–1.97) 0.693
Tumor type
 mucinous vs. non-mucinous mucinous 1.37 (0.73–2.59) 0.321
Early stage (Stage I & II)
MUC4 (low vs. high expression) high expression 3.77 (1.46–9.73) 0.006
Tumor grade (high vs. low) high grade 2.91 (1.00–8.44) 0.049
Advanced stage (Stage III & IV)
MUC4(low vs. high expression) high expression 1.74 (0.87–3.45) 0.113