Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Forces. 2009 Sep;88(1):1–29. doi: 10.1353/sof.0.0233

Table 2.

Results from Multinomial Logistic Regressions Predicting Child-Care Arrangements

Relative Risk Ratios for Child Care Type (vs. Center Care)
Group Care Relative Care In-Home Care Maternal Care
36-Month Model
Maternal Education .99 .88* 1.00 .86**
Child Characteristics
 Male 1.07 1.15 1.19 1.10
 Black 1.34 1.15 .96 .82
 Other .46* 1.12 .42+ .75
Family Characteristics
 Single .42* .26** 1.25 .54
 Stepfamily .55 .85 2.80* 1.85
 Cohabiting .95 .65 2.76 .72
 Number of Children .87 1.21+ 2.17*** 1.36**
 Income .90* .82*** 1.13* .77***
 Mother’s Age at Birth 1.01 .98 1.03 .99
Maternal Employment
 Parttime 2.10* 2.69*** 2.40* .16***
 Fulltime 2.89* 1.55+ 1.10 .08***
 Non-Standard Hours 2.03* 5.06*** 1.25 1.48
54-Month Model
Maternal Education .99 .97 1.21+ .99
Child Characteristics
 Male .96 1.04 1.69 1.19
 Black .95 .52+ .23* .68
 Other .63 .85 .11** 1.57
Family Characteristics
 Single .98 .21*** 11.37** .27*
 Stepfamily 2.49* 1.13 8.71*** .87
 Cohabiting 1.11 .76 2.51 .45
 Number of Children .86 1.01 1.96*** 1.04
 Income .93 .86** 1.05 .66***
 Mother’s Age at Birth 1.01 .98 1.02 .98
Maternal Employment
Parttime 2.03+ 3.49*** 2.40 .54+
Fulltime 3.45*** 2.82*** 8.74*** .11***
Non-Standard Hours .67 3.95*** 1.83 .66

Source: NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development

Notes: Models were estimated with each arrangement type as reference category.

Relative risk ratios presented above are for center care as reference. All models controlled for site, maternal PPVT-R score, maternal depression, resident fathers’ college education and resident fathers’ employment. N = 1,127.

+

p < .10

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001