Skip to main content
. 2009 May 16;35(1):51–60. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp036

Table III.

Regression Results across Injury Assessment Methods (N = 812)

Medically attended injuries
Minor injuries
Close calls
Variable B SE B eb B SE B eb B SE B eb
Continuous outcome
    Child sex 0.19 0.22 1.20 0.42 0.11 1.52*** 0.28 0.16 1.32
    Child behavior −0.01 0.01 0.99 0.03 0.01 1.03*** 0.02 0.01 1.02*
    Age of mother 0.04 0.03 1.04 0.01 0.01 1.01 −0.03 0.02 0.97
    Maternal depression 0.04 0.01 1.04*** 0.01 0.01 1.01 0.01 0.01 1.01
    SES 0.02 0.05 1.02 −0.02 0.02 0.98 −0.01 0.03 1.00
    Home environment 0.00 0.13 1.00 0.03 0.05 1.03 0.01 0.08 1.01
Dichotomous outcome
    Child sex 0.09 0.67 1.09 −0.23 0.26 0.80
    Child behavior −0.10 0.06 0.91 −0.02 0.01 0.98
    Age of mother 0.08 0.09 1.08 −0.00 0.03 1.00
    Maternal depression 0.06 0.03 1.06 −0.01 0.02 0.99
    SES −0.08 0.17 0.93 −0.03 0.05 0.97
    Home environment −0.22 0.30 0.80 −0.13 0.11 .88

Note. ZIP regression was used for medically attended injuries, negative binomial for minor injuries, and ZINB for close calls. eb = factor change (Long & Freese, 2006), and interpretation of this value is similar to that of odds ratios (i.e., for a unit change in variable x, the expected count changes by a factor of eb).

*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.