Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2010 Jul–Aug;81(4):1320–1335. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01471.x

Table 2.

Means, standard deviations, and ANOVA comparisons of the three family typologies on seven defining variables

Cohesive (C) (n = 137)
Enmeshed (E) (n = 51)
Disengaged (D) (n = 43)
M SD M SD M SD F(2, 230) Post Hoc
Wave 1:
Interparental Hostility −.46 .53 1.47 .79 −.27 .64 187.50* E > C, D
Interparental Withdrawal −.36 .67 −.18 .74 1.38 .97 90.50* D > E, C
Parental Emotional Availability .31 .82 .01 1.02 −.99 .86 36.17* E, C > D
Parental Intrusiveness −.14 .95 .09 1.07 .34 .99 4.20* D > C
Child Relatedness .18 .96 −.12 1.01 −.44 .98 7.23* E, D > C
Triadic Competition −.08 .90 .40 1.23 −.28 .88 6.20* E > C, D
Triadic Cooperation .18 .91 −.16 .98 −.37 1.18 5.97* C > D, E
Triadic Cohesiveness .27 .95 −.20 .92 −.61 .91 15.59* C > E, D

Post hoc comparisons used Tukey’s HSD to control for alpha level, “>“ refers to significantly larger whereas “,” refer to not-significantly different at alpha = .05 level.

*

p ≤ .001