Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 25;5:28. doi: 10.1186/1748-7188-5-28

Table 2.

Solutions for proteome datasets

Proteome length IP Greedy |A| |P|
Homo sapiens 4-5 2,020 (10.1%) 2,292 (11.5%) 527,164 20,010

Mus musculus 4-5 1,541 (9.6%) 1,727 (10.8%) 473,406 15,995

Rattus norvegicus 4-5 851 (11.7%) 970 (13.3%) 273,558 7,295

Bos taurus 4-5 790 (14.2%) 903 (16.1%) 199,735 5,584

Saccharomyces cervisiae 4-5 1,000 (15.6%) 1,134 (17.6%) 240,253 6,422

Homo sapiens 4 2,026 (10.1%) 2,306 (11.5%) 86,963 19,979

Mus musculus 4 1,529 (9.6%) 1,737 (10.9%) 83,073 15,974

Rattus norvegicus 4 858 (11.8%) 975 (13.4%) 64,058 7,294

Bos taurus 4 792(14.2%) 896 (16.1%) 53,751 5,576

Saccharomyces cervisiae 4 995 (15.5%) 1,130 (17.6%) 58,464 6,405

Comparison of the solution quality of the integer program IP (CPLEX solver, running time limited to 12 hours) and the greedy set cover algorithm on proteomes of different species, and epitope length settings. |A| denotes the number of different epitopes, |P| the number of target proteins, the percentage next to solution sizes is the coverage score Inline graphic