Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 28;430(Pt 1):39–48. doi: 10.1042/BJ20091758

Table 3. Pooled data for the binding affinities of GFP–SRY proteins to CaM and Impβ1, as determined using native PAGE and AlphaScreen® assays.

Results in native PAGE experiments such as those in Figure 5(A), were scored according to binding strength: +++, strong binding; +, weak binding; –, no binding. Results are means±S.E.M. for n (in parentheses) experiments for the AlphaScreen® binding experiments (see Figure 5B); where significant differences in binding affinities of the mutant derivatives compared with that of the WT were observed, P values were calculated using Student's t test with InStat2.01. NS, not significant.

CaM binding Impβ1 binding
SRY derivative Native PAGE AlphaScreen® Kd (nM) Native PAGE AlphaScreen® Kd (nM)
WT HMG +++ (6) 0.43±0.07 (13) +++ (6) 0.94±0.14 (13)
HMG-M64T – (2) 2.05±0.31 (7) P<0.0001 +++ (2) 1.42±0.20 (3) NS
HMG-F67V – (1) 1.25±0.27 (4) P=0.0004 +++ (1) 1.09±0.05 (5) NS
HMG-R76P – (3) 1.18±0.20 (3) P=0.0004 +++ (3) 0.89±0.22 (5) NS
HMG-Y127C +++ (3) 0.62±0.05 (5) NS + (3) 3.60±0.72 (4) P<0.0001