Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 25;10:329. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-329

Table 2.

Functional annotation analysis of differentially expressed genes

Biological processes affected by over-expression of wild type and truncated HMGA2
Vascular development (4 of 66 up-regulated genes) p = 0.039

Response to wounding (17 of 139 down-regulated genes) p < 0.001
Signal transduction (40/139) p < 0.001
Chemotaxis (11/139) p < 0.001
Cytosolic calcium ion homeostasis (5/139) p < 0.001
Phosphate transport (5/139) p = 0.0017
Regulation of cell proliferation (11/139) p = 0.0033
Cell migration (8/139) p = 0.0057
Cell recognition (3/139) p = 0.027
Epithelial cell differentiation (3/139) p = 0.026
Wound healing (4/139) p = 0.042

Biological processes affected by over-expression of wild type HMGA2

Multi-cellular organismal development (20 of 84 up-regulated genes) p = 0.0011
Response to hormone stimulus (4/84) p = 0.0034
Regulation of signal transduction (7/84) p = 0.022

Pyridine nucleotide biosynthetic process (3 of 99 down-regulated genes) p = 0.0017
Steroid hormone receptor activity (3/99) p = 0.0032
Negative regulation of transcription factor activity (3/99) p = 0.0034
Positive regulation of transcription (7/99) p = 0.0065
Response to external stimulus (8/99) p = 0.042

Biological processes affected by over-expression of truncated HMGA2

Regulation of transcription (61 of 258 up-regulated genes) p < 0.001
Intracellular protein transport across a membrane (6/258) p = 0.0032
Membrane organization and biogenesis (11/258) p = 0.011
Ras protein signaling transduction (9/258) p = 0.031
Regulation of cytoskeleton organization and biogenesis (4/258) p = 0.042

Antigen processing and presentation (10 of 239 down-regulated genes) p < 0.001
Multi-cellular organismal development (41/239) p = 0.0021
Cell adhesion (16/239) p = 0.019
Eye morphogenesis (3/239) p = 0.035

The genes were classified into biological processes using gene ontology terms. Each biological process was determined if it was significantly over- or underrepresented (p < 0.05) by comparing the observed frequency of genes to the expected frequency of genes on the Affymetrix GeneChip that cover 50 547 known genes. Significantly over- or under-represented processes were grouped and ranked according to the geometric mean of their p-values. A representative annotation term for each cluster, the number of genes associated with the term and its p-value was listed.