Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 29;5(7):e11850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011850

Table 2. Validation of potential HSF1 regulators using RNAi.

Firefly Luciferase Promoter Directional FDR Corrected
(log2Ratio vs. SCRAM_1)a p-valueb
siRNA Duplex HSP70B TK CMV HSP70B vs.TK HSP70B vs.CMV
PSMD3_1 −1.06±0.20 −1.23±0.53 −0.99±0.61 0.35 −0.4
PSMD3_2 −1.36±0.27 −1.53±0.53 −1.38±0.49 0.35 0.43
ZCCHC12_1 −2.25±0.31 −2.06±0.37 −1.96±0.42 −0.32 −0.25
ZCCHC12_2 −1.59±0.27 −1.43±0.10 −1.37±0.21 −0.24 −0.2
HMX2_1 −1.33±0.31 −1.00±0.32 −0.84±0.53 −0.18 −0.17
HMX2_2 −1.56±0.24 −1.12±0.53 −1.01±0.45 −0.18 −0.099
JMJD2C_1 −0.48±0.23 −0.89±0.34 −0.99±0.24 0.12 0.05
JMJD2C_2 −1.31±0.10 −2.17±0.86 −2.16±0.76 0.12 0.09
PRKCI_1 −0.18±0.05 0.26±0.04 0.42±0.20 −0.00016 −0.0064
PRKCI_2 −0.77±0.15 −0.12±0.35 −0.21±0.30 −0.038 −0.039
KCTD10_1 −0.52±0.23 −0.28±0.23 −0.29±0.13 −0.18 −0.14
KCTD10_2 0.39±0.29 −0.05±0.12 0.18±0.22 0.064 0.24
KIAA1826_1 −0.05±0.22 −0.35±0.25 −0.22±0.35 0.14 0.31
KIAA1826_2 −0.07±0.21 −0.13±0.17 0.02±0.29 0.36 −0.36
GTSE1_1 −0.47±0.17 −0.83±0.53 −0.82±0.55 0.21 0.22
GTSE1_2 0.01±0.14 −0.13±0.12 −0.11±0.24 0.17 0.3
SCRAM_2 (neg.) −0.05±0.18 −0.26±0.17 −0.14±0.23 0.15 0.35
HSF1_1 (pos.) −2.40±0.22 0.01±0.19 0.11±0.29 −0.00012 −0.00021
HSF1_2 (pos.) −3.37±0.25 −0.13±0.32 −0.04±0.24 −0.00012 −0.000078
a

Mean ± SD for 4 biological replicates.

b

Statistical significance between the HSP70B reporter and the TK and CMV reporters was calculated using a two sample t-test. The p-values were corrected for multiple comparisons using false discovery rate. Negative p-values denote a reduction in activity versus the control reporter. SCRAM_1 and SCRAM_2 denote negative RNAi controls. HSF1_1 and HSF1_2 denote positive RNAi controls for the reduction of HSF1 activity.