Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 27.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2010 Jul 27;49(29):6052–6063. doi: 10.1021/bi1006942

Table 2.

Hemin dissociation constants and m-values for the NH and IH states of holo-metMb variants1.

HoloMb Variant KNH0 (M) mNH kcal mol−1 M−1 KIH0 (M) mIH kcal mol−1 M−1 K-H pH 7–82 (M) K-H pH 52 (M)
WT 0.88 × 10−13 4.4 1.4 × 10−11 4.0 0.28 × 10−13 28 × 10−13
H64F 4.1 × 10−13 3.5 1.0 × 10−11 3.3 2.2 × 10−13 130 × 10−13
T67P 1.0 × 10−13 4.3 3.6 × 10−11 2.8 n.d. n.d.
V68T 0.016 × 10−13 4.1 1.5 × 10−11 3.2 ≤0.05 × 10−13 1.1 × 10−13
H97D 84 × 10−13 3.4 8.8 × 10−11 2.4 180 × 10−13 1100 × 10−13
1

The unfolding measurements were carried out in 0.01 M potassium phosphate pH 7, 20 °C. KUH0 and mUH were fixed to 1.0 × 10−6 M and 2.4 kcal mol−1 M−1, respectively, for all five variants as described in DISCUSSION. The CD, fluorescence, and Soret absorbance signal parameters are given in Table S2 of the Supplementary Material.

2

The values for K-H were computed from the hemin dissociation rate constants assuming that the association rate constant is 1.0 × 108 M−1 s−1 for all five variants, as described in Hargrove et al. (30). The dissociation rate constants were taken from data at pH 7 and pH 5 at 37 °C in 0.45 M sucrose and 0.15 M sodium phosphate or acetate, respectively (22, 29). Unfortunately, the dissociation rate constant for H64F at pH 7 reported in Hargrove et al. (29) is a misprint (i.e., the real value is 0.1 h−1 and not 0.01 h−1). We used the value of 0.08 h−1, which was measured in Hargrove et al. (39). n.d., not determined.