Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 30.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Dec;79(6):893–898.

Table 2.

Stool PCR sensitivity

(A) Analysis by subject
Fast DNA stool PCR Tuberculosis cases (N = 16) Healthy controls (N = 23) Sensitivity Specificity

Fast PCR (+) 6 0 38% 100%
Fast PCR (−) 10 23

Chelex stool PCR Tuberculosis cases (N = 16) Healthy controls (N = 23)

Chelex PCR (+) 5 0 31% 100%
Chelex PCR (−) 11 23

(B) Analysis by specimen
Stool and culture
samples from cases
(N = 28)
Healthy control samples
(N = 28)
Sensitivity Specificity

Fast (+) stool PCR 9 0 31% 100%
Fast (−) stool PCR 19 28
Chelex (+) stool PCR 6 0 21% 100%
Chelex (−) stool PCR 22 28
Gastric aspirate culture (+) 20 Not done 71% NA
Gastric aspirate culture (−) 8 Not done
Nasopharyngeal aspirate culture (+) 9 (missing 1) 28 31% 100%
Nasopharyngeal aspirate culture (−) 18 28

The sensitivity and specificity of stool PCR for the detection of M. tuberculosis is shown, analyzed by DNA extraction diagnostic method amongst children with at least one positive TB culture and from healthy control children. (A) Analysis by subject and (B) analysis by specimen: sensitivity and specificity of stool PCR of gastric aspirate culture and nasopharyngeal culture for detection of M. tuberculosis.