Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul;83(1):144–151. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0442

Table 2.

Comparisons between recalled dietary intake and pica behavior at any point during current pregnancy among 2,367 pregnant women, Zanzibar, Tanzania

Dietary intake Pica status
No geophagy n = 2,243 Geophagy n = 124 No amylophagy n = 1,508 Amylophagy n = 859 No pica n = 1,470 Any pica n = 897
No. of meals per day* 2.6 (0.6) 2.5 (0.5) 2.6 (0.6) 2.6 (0.6) 2.6 (0.6) 2.6 (0.6)
No. of foods eaten in last 7 days* 11.1 (3.1) 10.8 (3.3) 11.3 (3.1) 10.9 (3.0) 11.3 (3.1) 10.8 (3.0)
Servings of heme-rich food in past 7days*§ 7.7 (3.1) 7.3 (2.9) 7.8 (3.0) 7.5 (3.1) 7.8 (3.0) 7.5 (3.1)
Servings of food high in inorganic iron in past 7days* 4.8 (2.8) 4.6 (3.2) 4.8 (2.8) 4.7 (2.9) 4.8 (2.8) 4.7 (2.9)
Vitamins during current pregnancy, % 5.9 8.0 5.4 7.3 5.3 7.4
Iron supplements during current pregnancy, % 11.9 12.9 11.2 13.3 11.2 13.2
*

Values are mean (SD).

P < 0.05 versus no amylophagy group.

P < 0.05 versus no pica group.

§

Defined as seafood, chicken, beef, goat, large fish, and whitebait.

Defined as eggs, greens, and beans.