Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul;83(1):144–151. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0442

Table 3.

Comparisons between parasite burden and pica status at time of baseline interview among 2,367 pregnant women, Zanzibar, Tanzania*

Geohelminth Pica status
No geophagy n = 929 Geophagy n = 41 No amylophagy n = 635 Amylophagy n = 335 No pica n = 620 Any pica n = 350
Ascaris, % 5.6 4.9 5.4 6.0 5.3 6.0
Median intensity Ascaris, eggs/g (IQR) 2,052 (552–3,264) 504 (72–936) 1,752 (672–2,640) 1,644 (372–4,764) 1,752 (672–2,640) 1,644 (372–4,764)
Trichuris, (%) 33.2 34.2 31.7 36.1 31.8 35.7
Median intensity Trichuris, eggs/g (IQR) 144 (72–384) 180 (72–648) 144 (72–288) 168 (72–480) 144 (72–288) 168 (72–480)
Hookworm, % 32.3 46.3 28.8 40.6 28.4 40.9§
Median intensity hookworm, eggs/g (IQR) 360 (120–948) 360 (144–1,536) 312 (120–792) 396 (120–1,176) 312 (120–792) 396 (120–1,176)
n = 2,243 n = 96 n = 1,648 n = 691 n = 1,615 n = 724
Malaria, % 6.8 6.3 7.0 6.2 7.1 6.1
*

IQR = interquartile range.

Intensity is calculated as eggs per gram of stool for infected women only. Significant differences are calculated by using the logged values of intensity, but untransformed values are listed for ease of interpretation.

P < 0.05 versus no amylophagy group.

§

P < 0.05 versus no pica group.