Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 23;20(8):1955–1963. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp266

Table 1.

Autoshaping, pretraining, and discrimination performance in 5-HTT null mutant mice

WT HET KO
Autoshaping sessions 1.9 ± 0.6 2.3 ± 0.9 2.0 ± 0.6
Pretraining
    Respond phase sessions 4.4 ± 1.6 3.4 ± 0.4 3.6 ± 1.1
    Punish phase sessions 6.8 ± 1.8 6.1 ± 1.9 7.3 ± 1.9
Discrimination
    Total trials 613.0 ± 104.2 389.1 ± 73.0 456.6 ± 157
    Total errors 184.3 ± 36.3 111.3 ± 25.1 133.9 ± 47.2
    Total correction errors 412.1 ± 88.2 225.9 ± 37.6 261.1 ± 81.8
    Total trials omitted 22.4 ± 7.7 4.6 ± 3.6 17.9 ± 10.2
    Average stimulus reaction time (s) 8.0 ± 1.0 6.0 ± 1.0 8.2 ± 0.4
    Average reward retrieval latency (s) 2.7 ± 0.5 2.8 ± 0.8 2.5 ± 0.4

Genotypes did not significantly differ in autoshaping, pretraining, or discrimination performance, although there was a nonsignificant trend for HET and KO mice to require fewer trials make fewer errors to reach criterion than WT controls. n = 8–10 per genotype. Data are means ± standard errors of the mean.