Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 23;20(6):1305–1313. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp192

Table 1.

Demographic, clinical, and cognitive characteristics of HC participants and individuals with MCI with HEF or LEF

HC, n = 222 (mean, SD) MCI HEF, n = 163 (mean, SD) MCI LEF, n = 195 (mean, SD) Statistical comparison
Age 76.54 (5.04) 75.49 (7.30) 75.52 (7.35) F2,577 = 1.73, P = 0.18
Education 16.04 (2.83) 16.16 (2.66) 15.57 (3.03) F2,577 = 2.19, P = 0.11
Gender (% men) 52% 59% 70%a χ22, N = 580 = 14.20, P < 0.005
VIQ estimate 119.88 (8.62) 118.43 (8.96) 114.89 (9.42)a F2,576 = 16.49, P < 0.001
MMSE 29.12 (0.99)b 27.35 (1.75) 26.98 (1.68) F2,577 = 124.92, P < 0.001
CDR-SB 0.03 (0.12)b 1.52 (0.83) 1.61 (0.91) F2,577 = 342.19, P < 0.001
% APOE ϵ4 + (+/−) 26% (57/162)b 47% (75/84) 58% (111/79)c χ22, N = 568 = 45.35, P < 0.001
Digit span backward 7.28 (2.12)b 7.69 (1.78) 5.08 (1.23)c F2,573 = 97.41, P < 0.001
Trail making A (s) 36.09 (13.05)b 41.64 (19.76) 43.91 (20.10) F2,573 = 9.42, P < 0.001
Trail making B (s) 87.37 (41.02)b 89.00 (37.47) 150.93 (71.33)c F2,573 = 86.16, P < 0.001
EF score 0.33 (0.63)b 0.52 (0.43) −0.63 (0.51)c F2,573 = 218.94, P < 0.001
Animal fluency 19.97 (5.65)b 17.02 (4.37) 15.33 (4.87) F2,573 = 37.02, P < 0.001
Visuoconstruction (error score) 0.35 (0.50)b 0.43 (0.53) 0.60 (0.59) F2,573 = 6.43, P < 0.005

Note: SD, standard deviation. Statistical comparison refers to the results of overall group comparison, controlling for age, gender, and estimated VIQ.

a

The MCI LEF group was significantly different (P < 0.05) from the HC and the MCI HEF groups.

b

The HC group was significantly different (P < 0.05) from the 2 MCI groups.

c

Significant difference (P < 0.05) between the MCI HEF group versus the LEF group.