Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 23;20(6):1305–1313. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp192

Table 2.

Memory performance of the 3 groups

HC (mean, SD) MCI HEF (mean, SD) MCI LEF (mean, SD) Statistical comparison Cohen's d
Modified LM I 13.85 (3.48)a 8.02 (3.02) 6.57 (3.12)b F2,568 = 93.26, P < 0.001 0.28
Modified LM II 13.03 (3.58)a 4.35 (2.77) 3.55 (2.53) F2,568 = 234.77, P < 0.001 0.15
LM retention 0.96 (0.25)a 0.52 (0.32) 0.57 (0.49) F2,568 = 44.11, P < 0.001 −0.06
AVLT total 43.36 (9.11)a 33.80 (9.68) 28.79 (7.80)b F2,568 = 41.83, P < 0.001 0.43
AVLT SD recall 8.16 (3.40)a 4.37 (3.62) 3.49 (2.56) F2,568 = 28.50, P < 0.001 0.19
AVLT LD recall 7.43 (3.70)a 3.55 (3.63) 2.36 (2.95)b F2,568 = 30.18, P < 0.001 0.27
AVLT disc (%) 90.29 (9.74)a 77.65 (14.85) 74.10 (14.85) F2,568 = 19.40, P < 0.001 0.22

Note: SD, standard deviation. Statistical comparison refers to the results of overall group comparison, controlling for age, gender, estimated VIQ, and CDR-SB. AVLT SD = AVLT short delay; AVLT LD = AVLT long delay; AVLT disc = AVLT discriminability on the recognition task.

a

The HC group was significantly different (P < 0.001) from the 2 MCI groups; and Cohen's d was based on the MCI HEF and MCI LEF comparisons.

b

Significant difference between the MCI HEF group versus the LEF group (P < 0.05).