Table 5.
Ten qualities of a good reviewer
| 1. Competence (and/or expertise) in the field |
| 2. Consistency (within and between reviews) |
| 3. Confidentiality |
| 4. Responsibility in feedback (constructive, educational, unbiased) |
| 5. Knowledge of the scientific process (research and writing) |
| 6. Integrity |
| 7. Impartiality |
| 8. Timeliness (punctuality) |
| 9. Detail orientation |
| 10. Outstanding language skills |
Adapted with permission from Jordan K, Pederick R. Guidelines for reviewers [cited 2009 Jul 18]. Available from: http://people.bath.ac.uk/liskmj/living-spring/journal/reviewgd.htm30 and adapted with permission from Evans AT, McNutt RA, Fletcher SW, et al. The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good quality reviews. J Gen Intern Med 1993 Aug;8(8):422–8.34