Table 1.
Variables | Mean | St.dev. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Gender | 1.48 | .50 | – | |||||||||||||||
2 | Age | 42.78 | 9.72 | −.27 | – | ||||||||||||||
3 | Leader’s verbal aggressiveness | 2.42 | .77 | −.02 | −.01 | .92 | |||||||||||||
4 | Leader’s expressiveness | 3.21 | .67 | .12 | −.05 | −.18 | .89 | ||||||||||||
5 | Leader’s preciseness | 3.35 | .73 | .01 | .12 | −.40 | .18 | .90 | |||||||||||
6 | Leader’s assuredness | 3.62 | .51 | .05 | .06 | −.01 | .33 | .43 | .81 | ||||||||||
7 | Leader’s supportiveness | 3.46 | .67 | .05 | −.03 | −.57 | .54 | .44 | .35 | .89 | |||||||||
8 | Leader’s argumentativeness | 2.51 | .71 | .02 | .07 | −.04 | .30 | −.09 | .00 | .18 | .68 | ||||||||
9 | Charismatic leadership | 3.52 | .73 | .01 | .08 | −.37 | .45 | .52 | .64 | .66 | .25 | .90 | |||||||
10 | Human-oriented leadership | 3.59 | .77 | .01 | .02 | −.62 | .51 | .47 | .32 | .87 | .16 | .68 | .91 | ||||||
11 | Task-oriented leadership | 3.19 | .63 | .02 | .09 | .08 | .13 | .35 | .48 | .21 | .01 | .49 | .22 | .86 | |||||
12 | Subordinate’s KS: donating | 3.88 | .54 | .08 | .00 | −.22 | .24 | .22 | .22 | .40 | .03 | .37 | .42 | .25 | .76 | ||||
13 | Subordinate’s KS: collecting | 3.43 | .61 | .13 | −.08 | −.16 | .31 | .28 | .24 | .36 | .14 | .46 | .41 | .22 | .53 | .67 | |||
14 | Leader’s performance | 3.29 | .77 | .00 | .06 | −.46 | .33 | .61 | .49 | .60 | .09 | .72 | .68 | .38 | .33 | .39 | .80 | ||
15 | Satisfaction with the leader | 3.28 | 1.09 | .00 | .07 | −.56 | .43 | .55 | .43 | .71 | .15 | .73 | .79 | .30 | .35 | .36 | .83 | .93 | |
16 | Subordinate’s commitment | 3.44 | .80 | .04 | .02 | −.29 | .32 | .34 | .41 | .57 | .15 | .63 | .60 | .26 | .36 | .34 | .61 | .66 | .82 |
Note: all correlations exceeding the |.11| level are significant at p < .05, gender: 1 = male, 2 = female