Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 4;25(3):367–380. doi: 10.1007/s10869-009-9140-2

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics, correlations, and Cronbach’s alphas (on the diagonal) of the variables in this study (N = 269, except for age, N = 261)

Variables Mean St.dev. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
1 Gender 1.48 .50
2 Age 42.78 9.72 −.27
3 Leader’s verbal aggressiveness 2.42 .77 −.02 −.01 .92
4 Leader’s expressiveness 3.21 .67 .12 −.05 −.18 .89
5 Leader’s preciseness 3.35 .73 .01 .12 −.40 .18 .90
6 Leader’s assuredness 3.62 .51 .05 .06 −.01 .33 .43 .81
7 Leader’s supportiveness 3.46 .67 .05 −.03 −.57 .54 .44 .35 .89
8 Leader’s argumentativeness 2.51 .71 .02 .07 −.04 .30 −.09 .00 .18 .68
9 Charismatic leadership 3.52 .73 .01 .08 −.37 .45 .52 .64 .66 .25 .90
10 Human-oriented leadership 3.59 .77 .01 .02 −.62 .51 .47 .32 .87 .16 .68 .91
11 Task-oriented leadership 3.19 .63 .02 .09 .08 .13 .35 .48 .21 .01 .49 .22 .86
12 Subordinate’s KS: donating 3.88 .54 .08 .00 −.22 .24 .22 .22 .40 .03 .37 .42 .25 .76
13 Subordinate’s KS: collecting 3.43 .61 .13 −.08 −.16 .31 .28 .24 .36 .14 .46 .41 .22 .53 .67
14 Leader’s performance 3.29 .77 .00 .06 −.46 .33 .61 .49 .60 .09 .72 .68 .38 .33 .39 .80
15 Satisfaction with the leader 3.28 1.09 .00 .07 −.56 .43 .55 .43 .71 .15 .73 .79 .30 .35 .36 .83 .93
16 Subordinate’s commitment 3.44 .80 .04 .02 −.29 .32 .34 .41 .57 .15 .63 .60 .26 .36 .34 .61 .66 .82

Note: all correlations exceeding the |.11| level are significant at p < .05, gender: 1 = male, 2 = female