Table 1.
Performance of SVM models developed for different CYP isoforms, all models evaluated using fivefold cross-validation technique
| Isoforms | POE* | NEE** | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy (%) | MCC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYP3A4 | 111 | 105 | 81.08 | 81.74 | 81.42 | 0.63 |
| CYP2D6 | 47 | 169 | 74.47 | 83.24 | 81.24 | 0.54 |
| CYP1A2 | 29 | 187 | 79.31 | 83.76 | 83.19 | 0.49 |
| CYP2C9 | 20 | 196 | 70.00 | 85.92 | 84.51 | 0.40 |
| CYP2C19 | 19 | 197 | 52.63 | 72.46 | 70.80 | 0.15 |
POE*: Positive Examples
NEE**: Negative Examples
Thres*: Threshold (Cutoff Value)