Table 5.
Role of TFs in comparison with presence of SUMOylation consensus motif and the role reported in the literature.
Bcd | Cad | Hb | Tll | Gt | Kr | Kni | TorRE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
roles | s | + | s | - | s | s | - | s |
Number of SUMO sites | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
Perkins et al. [29] | + | + | s | - | s | s | - | NA |
Schroeder et al. [9] | + | + | s | - | - | (s) | - | + |
Rivera-Pomar et al. [35] | + | + | s | - | - | s | - | NA |
Sanchez et al. [36] | + | + | s | - | - | - | - | NA |
Jaeger et al. [37] | + | + | s | - | s | s | s | NA |
The first row indicates the role we assign to the TFs, where "+" indicate activators, "-" indicate repressors, and "s" indicates a TF switching roles. The second row shows the number of sites found in the protein sequence of the TF that match the SUMO-consensus motif. The last rows summarizes the roles for the TFs previously reported in the literature.