Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 12;11:374. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-374

Table 5.

Comparing performance of side modelling methods

Method RMSD (Å) Contact score χ1 (± 15°) χ1+2 (± 15°)

All Buried Exposed % %
Hunter 1.47 0.73 1.72 39 79 60
OPUS-Rota [26] 1.56 0.91 1.80 35 77 56
SCAP [50] 1.72 1.00 1.96 37 69 46
SCCOMP [42] 1.72 1.03 1.96 34 69 49
SCWRL4.0 [51] 1.65 0.87 1.93 35 76 55

Side chains were rebuilt using five different methods in a set of 94 high-resolution protein structures. The average statistics on side chain prediction accuracy was calculated in terms of side chain RMSD, contact score, and chi-angle prediction accuracy. Side chain RMSD was calculated for side chain atoms except Cβ. A residue was considered as exposed or buried if its relative solvent exposed area is greater or less than 15%, respectively. Contact score reflects amount of correctly predicted atom-atom contacts and is calculated as described in Methods.