Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 7;10:197. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-197

Table 3.

Discrete choice model results and marginal effects by perspective

Perspectives

Policy makers People living with HIV/AIDS Village Health Volunteers
Criteria Levels Coefficient
(95% CI)
(p-value) Marginal effect Coefficient
(95% CI)
(p-value) Marginal effect Coefficient
(95% CI)
(p-value) Marginal effect
Target group Child
Teen 1.049* (0.001) 0.183 0.135 (0.385) 0.030 0.830* (0.000) 0.181
(0.445, 1.654) (-0.169, 0.440) (0.464, 1.196)
HiRrisk 1.153* (0.001) 0.199 0.022 (0.900) 0.005 0.314 (0.142) 0.069
(0.502, 1.803) (-0.323, 0.368) (-0.105, 0.734)
Adults 0.023 (0.926) 0.004 -0.279 (0.065) -0.061 -0.249 (0.176) -0.054
(-0.470, 0.517) (-0.575, 0.017) (-0.609, 0.112)
Gender of target group Male
Female -0.256 (0.321) -0.043 0.082 (0.544) 0.018 0.196 (0.229) 0.043
(-0.762, 0.250) (-0.184, 0.348) (-0.123, 0.514)
BothGen 0.266 (0.189) 0.045 1.132* (0.000) 0.255 0.724* (0.000) 0.161
(-0.131, 0.663) (0.911, 1.354) (0.458, 0.990)
Type of intervention HIV
AIDS -0.493* (0.019) -0.088 1.091* (0.000) 0.245 -0.476* (0.001) -0.105
(-0.904, -0.081) (0.869, 1.313) (-0.744, -0.208)
Prevent 1.967* (0.000) 0.333 0.212 (0.116) 0.047 0.246 (0.137) 0.054
(1.450, 2.485) (-0.052, 0.476) (-0.078, 0.569)
Effectiveness LoEff
HiEff 1.983* (0.000) 0.385 0.627* (0.000) 0.140 1.185* (0.000) 0.275
(1.643, 2.323) (0.454, 0.800) (0.973, 1.395)
Quality of evidence Weak
on effectiveness Strong 1.310* (0.000) 0.237 0.356* (0.000) 0.079 0.349* (0.001) 0.077
(0.976, 1.645) (0.183, 0.528) (0.139, 0.560)
Log likelihood -424.4532 -1434.3323 -963.3818
Pseudo R2 0.2747 0.0992 0.0984
Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square (p-value) 1.36
(0.995)
2.79
(0.947)
1.87
(0.985)

*Significant variables (p < 0.05)

Likelihood ratio test (p < 0.000)