Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 6.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Biol Interact. 2010 May 21;187(1-3):135–141. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2010.05.009

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

A) Inhibition of acetylthiocholine hydrolysis by the A-site inhibitor edrophonium or the P-site inhibitor propidium. Second order rate constants kE were calculated from data in Fig. 3 of reference (6), and the ratios kE [I]=0/kE +I were fitted to eq. 3. For edrophonium, KI = 0.31 ± 0.01 µM and α = 0.0034 ± 0.0014 (not significantly different from zero). Initial fitting with propidium gave α = −0.008 ± 004 (also not significantly different from zero), and α was fixed at 0 to give KI = 1.61 ± 0.04 µM. B, C) Inhibitor competition assay for assignment of AChE binding site specificity. Values of kE, with inhibitors I1 (thioflavin T) and I2 as indicated, were calculated from data in Fig. 3 of reference (6), and the ratios kE +I2/kE [I2]=0 were fitted to the reciprocal form of eq. 4. K2 values were set as the KIs from Panel A, and K1 for thioflavin T was fixed at 1.0 µM (6). For propidium and thioflavin T (panel B), the affinity in the binary complexes relative to that in the ternary complex was given by K12/K1 = 43 ± 8. For edrophonium and thioflavin T (panel C), K12/K1 = 0.81 ± 0.04. Dotted lines were calculated with the same values of K1 and K2 but with [I1]/K12 fixed at 0.