Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jun 22;52(2):444–452. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.048

Table I.

Mouse Vein Graft Model Advantages/Disadvantages

Advantages Disadvantages
  • The most commonly used mammalian model organism, with a robust existing literature

  • Advanced genetics (mouse genome has been sequenced) and array of mice available

  • Established models of human disease, such as hypercholesterolemia, diabetes and obesity

  • Less sentient than other available animal vein graft models

  • Many murine models are new, and lack a longstanding track record


  • Relatively similar to humans in anatomy, physiology and genetics

  • As with all non-human research, applicability to the human situation may be limited


  • Technological advances allow physiologic monitoring, such as flow rate, and blood pressure monitoring

  • Monitoring and measuring may lack resolution in small mammals

  • Small scale instruments and monitoring devices can be relatively expensive


  • Small, easy to maintain and handle, low housing costs

  • Have a short generation time, reproduce quickly and prolific

  • Low doses/volumes required for test solutions (e.g. antibodies, gene therapy vehicles, pharmacologic compounds)

  • Surgical procedures can be difficult to complete and reliably reproduce due to the small size of the murine vasculature

  • Available tissue quantities for assays are small

  • Limited volume of intimal hyperplasia in wild type mice can make identification of preventative therapies difficult


  • Wide availability of reagents for use with murine tissue

  • Antibodies are often of murine origin